Addressing social norms in women’s entrepreneurship : Pathways to sustainability, inclusiveness, and social entrepreneurship
*Pramila SatpathyCorresponding authorpramila@xim.edu.inSchool of Rural ManagementXIM UniversityPuri, Odisha, 752050, India0009-0000-6016-0709View full profile →
* Corresponding author · click or hover a name for details
- Received:
- 01 Apr 2026
- Published Online:
- 30 Sep 2026
- Article type:
- Research Article
- Language:
- EN
- Article no.:
- JSMS-1704
- Pages:
- 981–998
Abstract
This study analyzes women entrepreneurship and social norms from the perspective of self-help groups (SHGs) in India, particularly in Odisha. SHGs have become important platforms for facilitating women’s economic participation, collective empowerment, and local innovation. Yet, deeply rooted patriarchal, caste, and cultural norms continue to constrain women’s entrepreneurial aspirations, decision-making power, and market access. Using a qualitative case study approach, including focus groups, in-depth interviews, and an integrated literature review, the study focuses on how these social norms influence and limit entrepreneurial outcomes.
Three main areas of evidence, consistent with the conference theme, have been identified. First, sustainability: SHGs contribute to sustainable development by providing livelihood opportunities, increasing economic resilience, and stimulating communitybased economic activity. However, these potentials may be lost in the absence of supportive institutional reforms. Second, inclusion: While strong social hierarchies still create unequal access and limit leadership potential, SHGs are inclusive spaces for poor women. It is important to remove these barriers for promoting inclusive development. Third, social entrepreneurship: SHGs are a means to bring about social cohesion for economic growth, but they must be strengthened by enabling policies and gender-neutral networking systems. To unleash the potential of women SHG members by creating inclusive ecosystems that foster sustainable development, the study argues that harmful social norms must be addressed.
The elimination of constraining social norms is essential in unlocking women’s entrepreneurial potential and building inclusive settings that support sustainable economic growth. The findings have significant implications for academics, policymakers, and industry partners committed to revitalizing entrepreneurship for promoting social justice and sustainable development.
Keywords
Subject Classifications
References
[1] S. L. Schensul, R. Singh, J. J. Schensul, R. K. Verma, J. A. Burleson, and B. K. Nastasi, “Community gender norms change as a part of a multilevel approach to sexual health among married women in Mumbai, India,” Am. J. Community Psychol., vol. 56, nos. 1–2, pp. 57–68 (2015), doi: 10.1007/s10464-015-9731-1.
[2] D. K. Ghimire, “Challenges of contribution-based social security in Nepal,” Contemp. Soc. Sci., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 1–19 (2024), doi: 10.62047/CSS.2024.09.30.1.
[3] Y. Du, J. Nordell, and K. Joseph, “Insidious nonetheless: How small effects and hierarchical norms create and maintain gender disparities in organizations,” Socius, vol. 8, Art. no. 23780231221117888 (2022), doi: 10.1177/23780231221117888.
[4] C. J. Boudreaux and B. Nikolaev, “Capital is not enough: Opportunity entrepreneurship and formal institutions,” Small Bus. Econ., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 709–738 (2019), doi: 10.1007/s11187-018-0068-7.
[5] A. Aggrawal, J. Carrick, J. Kennedy, and G. Fernandez, “The plight of female entrepreneurs in India,” Economies, vol. 10, no. 11, Art. no. 264 (2022), doi: 10.3390/economies10110264.
[6] S. M. Y. Arafat, S. K. Kar, M. Marthoenis, P. Sharma, E. Hoque Apu, and R. Kabir, “Psychological underpinning of panic buying during pandemic (COVID-19),” Psychiatry Res., vol. 289, Art. no. 113061 (2020), doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113061.
[7] N. Kabeer, “Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment,” Dev. Change, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 435–464 (1999), doi: 10.1111/1467-7660.00125.
[8] P. Vasishta and A. Singla, “Self-help groups and women empowerment: Developing a framework for sustainability of SHGs,” Int. J. Soc. Econ., vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 1725–1740 (2025), doi: 10.1108/IJSE-05-2023-0389.
[9] L. Gram, S. Desai, and A. Prost, “Classroom, club or collective? Three types of community-based group intervention and why they matter for health,” BMJ Glob. Health, vol. 5, no. 12, Art. no. e003302 (2020), doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003302.
[10] A. Hazra, A. Das, J. Ahmad, S. Singh, I. Chaudhuri, A. Purty, A. Prost, and S. Desai, “Matching intent with intensity: Implementation research on the intensity of health and nutrition programs with women’s self-help groups in India,” Glob. Health Sci. Pract., vol. 10, no. 2, Art. no. e2100383 (2022), doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00383.
[11] D. Basak and I. Roy Chowdhury, “Role of self-help groups on socioeconomic development and the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) among rural women in Cooch Behar District, India,” Reg. Sustainability, vol. 5, no. 2, Art. no. 100140 (2024), doi: 10.1016/j.regsus.2024.100140.
[12] D. B. J. Sinha, “Challenges and opportunities in SHG-led microfinance in the plateau region of Ranchi,” Int. J. Sci. Technol., vol. 16, no. 2 (2025), doi: 10.71097/IJSAT.v16.i2.6547.
[13] G. Bhatt and A. Kalkhundiya, “SHG—As a backbone for women—with special reference to the Kumaun region,” J. Entrep. Manag., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 59–68 (2024).
[14] K. Deininger and Y. Liu, “Economic and social impacts of an innovative self-help group model in India,” World Develop., vol. 43, pp. 149–163 (2013), doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.09.019.
[15] P. Chatterjee, J. Chen, A. Yousafzai, I. Kawachi, and S. V. Subramanian, “When social identities intersect: Understanding inequities in growth outcomes by religion-caste and religion-tribe as intersecting strata of social hierarchy for Muslim and Hindu children in India,” Int. J. Equity Health, vol. 22, no. 1, Art. no. 115 (2023), doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01917-3.
[16] Y. Govindharaj, “Caste politics, social exclusion, and identity formation in Tamil Nadu: Examining the impact of economic, political, and social dynamics on Dalit contestations, gender inequality, and poverty alleviation—An empirical analysis,” Science, Technology And Development Journal (STDJ), vol. XIV, pp. 23–40 (2025).
[17] R. Mondal and P. Nath, “Pathways to empowerment in diversity: SHG promotion in the rural plains and tribal hills of Western and Eastern India,” Social Science Research Network (Nov. 11, 2024), Art. no. 5033859, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5033859.
[18] H. M. Haugh and A. Talwar, “Linking Social Entrepreneurship and Social Change: The Mediating Role of Empowerment,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 133, no. 4, pp. 643–658 (Feb. 2016), doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2449- 4.
[19] B. Luke and V. Chu, “Social enterprise versus social entrepreneurship: An examination of the ‘why’ and ‘how’ in pursuing social change,” Int. Small Bus. J., vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 764–784 (Nov. 2013), doi: 10.1177/0266242612462598.
[20] F. Perrini and C. Vurro, “Social entrepreneurship: Innovation and social change across theory and practice,” in Social Entrepreneurship, J. Mair, J. Robinson, and K. Hockerts, Eds. London, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 57–85 (2006), doi: 10.1057/9780230625655_5.
[21] D. C. North, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press (1990).
[22] J. Butler, Undoing Gender. New York, USA: Routledge (2005).
[23] S. Walby, “Varieties of gender regimes,” Social Politics: Int. Stud. Gender, State Soc., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 414–431 (2020), doi: 10.1093/sp/jxaa018.
[24] N. Shah and A. Sunil, “Empowering role of digital technology for women-run home-based businesses,” J. Stat. Manage. Syst., vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1553–1564 (2025), doi: 10.47974/JSMS-1518.
