Generative AI in academic research : A comprehensive bibliometric analysis using OpenAlex database
Ajay Kumar Chaubeyajaybhu21@gmail.comPrime Minister College of ExcellenceGovt. Rajnarayan Smriti CollegeWaidhan District Singrauli, Madhya Pradesh, India0000-0003-4925-7723View full profile →
* Corresponding author · click or hover a name for details
- Received:
- 01 Sep 2025
- Published Online:
- 30 Jun 2026
- Article type:
- Research Article
- Language:
- EN
- Article no.:
- CJSIM-2025-09008
- Pages:
- 173–201
Abstract
This research examines the progression of Generative AI in scholarly work through a bibliometric analysis of 1,329 articles from the past two decades, indexed in the OpenAlex database. The results demonstrate a swift annual growth rate of 36.01%. The fields of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence emerged as the primary research areas, establishing the intellectual backbone of the discipline. The United States was recognized as the foremost contributor to research, with Mike Perkins noted as the most active author. Analyses of keyword co-occurrence and thematic trends illustrate a strong multidisciplinary landscape, with notable growth into areas such as Psychology, Political Science, Engineering, Business, and Medicine. The findings also suggest a transition from discussions centered on specific tools to more expansive, application-focused, and interdisciplinary research. In summary, the research highlights the crucial role of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, while also underscoring the growing incorporation of Generative AI across various academic fields, offering valuable insights for future research strategies and policy development.
Keywords
References
[1] J. McCarthy, What is Artificial Intelligence? Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford Univ. Press (2007).
[2] M. Haenlein and A. Kaplan, “A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence,” Calif. Manage. Rev., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 5–14 (2019).
[3] S. Feuerriegel, J. Hartmann, C. Janiesch, and P. Zschech, “Generative AI,” Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng., vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 111–126 (2024).
[4] W. X. Zhao, K. Zhou, J. Li, T. Tang, X. Wang, Y. Hou, Y. Min, B. Zhang, J. Zhang, Z. Dong, Y. Du, C. Yang, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, J. Jiang, R. Ren, Y. Li, X. Tang, Z. Liu, P. Liu, J.-Y. Nie, and J.-R. Wen, “A survey of large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.18223, Mar. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.18223 [Accessed: August 31, 2025]
[5] D. R. E. Cotton, P. A. Cotton, and J. R. Shipway, “Chatting and cheating: ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT,” Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., pp. 1–12 (2023). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148 [Accessed: Aug. 31, 2025].
[6] Y. K. Dwivedi, N. Kshetri, L. Hughes, E. L. Slade, A. Jeyaraj, A. K. Kar, A. M. Baabdullah, A. Koohang, V. Raghavan, M. Ahuja, H. Albanna, M. A. Albashrawi, A. S. Al-Busaidi, J. Balakrishnan, Y. Barlette, S. Basu, I. Bose, L. Brooks, D. Buhalis, and C. M. Wright, “Opinion paper: ‘So what if ChatGPT wrote it?’ Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 71, Art. no. 102642, Aug. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642 [Accessed: Aug. 31, 2025].
[7] A. Saparov and H. He, “Language models are greedy reasoners: A systematic formal analysis of chain-of-thought,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.01240 (Oct. 2022).
[8] A. Owoseni, O. Kolade, and A. Egbetokun, Generative AI in Higher Education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer (2024).
[9] M. Grimes, G. von Krogh, S. Feuerriegel, F. Rink, and M. Gruber, “From scarcity to abundance: Scholars and scholarship in an age of generative artificial intelligence,” Acad. Manage. J., vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 1655–1670 (Dec. 2023).
[10] S. Eger, Y. Cao, J. D’Souza, A. Geiger, C. Greisinger, S. Gross, Y. Hou, B. Krenn, A. Lauscher, Y. Li, C. Lin, N. S. Moosavi, W. Zhao, and T. Miller, “Transforming science with large language models: A survey on AI-assisted scientific discovery, experimentation, content generation, and evaluation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.05151, Feb. 2025.
[11] L. Tang, X. Zhou, and M. Lu, “A GPT-based approach for scientometric analysis: Exploring the landscape of artificial intelligence research,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.09487 (Apr. 2023). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.09487 [Accessed: Sep. 3, 2025].
[12] L. Bornmann, L. Wu, and C. Ettl, “The use of ChatGPT for identifying disruptive papers in science: A first exploration,” Scientometrics, vol. 129, no. 11, pp. 7161–7165 (2024). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05176-z [Accessed: Sep. 3, 2025].
[13] N. J. van Eck and L. Waltman, “An open approach for classifying research publications,” Leiden Madtrics (Jan. 24, 2024). [Online]. Available: https://www.leidenmadtrics.nl/articles/an-open-approach-for-classifying-research-publications [Accessed: Sep. 3, 2025].
[14] M. Thelwall, “Can ChatGPT evaluate research quality?,” J. Data Inf. Sci., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1–21 (2024). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2024-0013 [Accessed: Sep. 3, 2025].
[15] C. Kooli and H. Al Muftah, “Artificial intelligence in healthcare: A comprehensive review of its ethical concerns,” Technol. Sustain., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 121–131 (2022). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/TECHS-12-2021-0029 [Accessed: Sep. 4, 2025].
[16] F. E. Sandnes, “Can we identify prominent scholars using ChatGPT?,” Scientometrics, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 713–718 (Jan. 2024). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04882-4 [Accessed: Sep. 4, 2025].
[17] M. Goyanes and C. Lopezosa, “ChatGPT en Ciencias Sociales: revisión de la literatura sobre el uso de inteligencia artificial (IA) de OpenAI en investigación cualitativa y cuantitativa,” Anuario ThinkEPI, vol. 18, Art. no. e18a04 (2024). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2024.e18a04 [Accessed: Sep. 4, 2025].
[18] Y. Ning, S. Teixayavong, Y. Shang, J. Savulescu, V. Nagaraj, D. Miao, M. Mertens, D. S. W. Ting, J. C. L. Ong, M. Liu, J. Cao, M. Dunn, R. Vaughan, M. E. H. Ong, J. J.-Y. Sung, E. J. Topol, and N. Liu, “Generative artificial intelligence in healthcare: ethical considerations and assessment checklist,” arXiv:2311.02107, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.02107 [Accessed: Jan. 10, 2026].
[19] K. Spector-Bagdady, “Generative-AI-generated challenges for health data research,” Amer. J. Bioethics, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1–5 (2023). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2023.2252311 [Accessed: Jan. 10, 2026].
[20] Z. Lin, “Why and how to embrace AI such as ChatGPT in your academic life,” R. Soc. Open Sci., vol. 10, no. 8, Art. no. 230753 (2023). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230658 [Accessed: Jan. 10, 2026].
[21] H. Zohny, J. McMillan, and M. King, “Ethics of generative AI,” J. Med. Ethics, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 79–80 (Feb. 2023). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2023-108909 [Accessed: Jan. 10, 2026].
[22] D. Schlagwein and L. Willcocks, “’ChatGPT et al.’: The ethics of using (generative) artificial intelligence in research and science,” J. Inf. Technol., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 232–238 (2023). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962231200411 [Accessed: Jan. 11, 2026].
[23] A. M. Al-Zahrani, “The impact of generative AI tools on researchers and research: Implications for academia in higher education,” Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1029–1043 (2024). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2271445 [Accessed: Jan. 11, 2026].
[24] G. Kurtz, M. Amzalag, N. Shaked, Y. Zaguri, D. Kohen-Vacs, E. Gal, G. Zailer, and E. Barak- Medina, “Strategies for integrating generative AI into higher education: Navigating challenges and leveraging opportunities,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 5, Art. no. 503, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050503 [Accessed: Jan. 11, 2026].
[25] I. Kunda, “Regulating the use of generative AI in academic research and publications,” in Proc. PUBMET2023: 10th Conf. Scholarly Commun. Context Open Sci., pp. 45–46 (2023).
[26] C. Rios-Campos, J. D. C. Luzuriaga Viteri, E. A. Palma Batalla, J. F. Castro Castro, J. Bautista Núñez, E. Vega Calderón, F. J. Gómez Nicacio, and M. Y. Pretell Tello, “Generative artificial intelligence,” South Florida J. Dev., vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 2305–2320, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.46932/sfjdv4n6-008 [Accessed: Jan. 11, 2026].
[27] J Li, X. Cai, and L. Cheng, “Legal regulation of generative AI: A multidimensional construction,” Int. J. Legal Discourse, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 365–388 (Dec. 2023). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2023-2017 [Accessed: Jan. 11, 2026].
[28] S. Moore and K. L. Lookadoo, “Communicating clear guidance: Advice for generative AI policy development in higher education,” Bus. Prof. Commun. Q., vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 610–629 (2024).
[29] N. Song, “Higher education crisis: Academic misconduct with generative AI,” J. Contingencies Crisis Manag., vol. 32, no. 1, Art. no. e12532 (2024). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12532 [Accessed: Jan. 12, 2026].
[30] N. Guillen-Yparrea and F. Hernandez-Rodriguez, “Unveiling generative AI in higher education: Insights from engineering students and professors,” in Proc. 2024 IEEE Global Eng. Educ. Conf. (EDUCON), Kos Island, Greece, pp. 1–5 (2024).
[31] K. Chen, A. Tallant, and I. Selig, “Exploring generative AI literacy in higher education: Student adoption, interaction, evaluation and ethical perceptions,” Inf. Learn. Sci., vol. 126, no. 1/2, pp. 132–148 (2025). [Online]. Available: 10.1108/ILS-10-2023-0160 [Accessed: Jan.12, 2026].
[32] Y. Chaaban, “Exploring research ethics through the lens of critical posthumanism in the age of Artificial Intelligence,” Teach. High. Educ., vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1740–1755 (2025). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2025.2465995 [Accessed: Jan. 13, 2026].
[33] A. Alduais, S. Qadhi, Y. Chaaban, and M. Khraisheh, “Utilizing generative AI responsibly and ethically for research purposes in higher education: A policy analysis,” Serials Rev., vol. 51, no. 3–4, pp. 120–170 (2025). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2025.2581429 [Accessed: Jan.12, 2026].
[34] M. Aria and C. Cuccurullo, “bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis,” J. Informetr., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 959–975 (2017). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 [Accessed: Jan.12, 2026].
[35] F. de Oliveira Dias and G. de Miranda Rocha, “Territorial development: A bibliometric analysis of scientific production through RStudio® and VOSviewer® (2013–2022),» Rev. Gest. Soc. Ambient., vol. 18, no. 2, Art. no. e045 (2024). [Online]. Available 10.24857/rgsa.v18n2-045 [Accessed: Jan. 12, 2026].
[36] A. N. Ansari, S. Ahmad, and S. M. Bhutta, “Mapping the global evidence around the use of ChatGPT in higher education: A systematic scoping review,” Educ. Inf. Technol., Vol.29, no.9, pp. 11281 – 11321 (2023). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12223-4 [Accessed: Aug. 30, 2025]
[37] C. Sharma, S. Sharma, V. Bhardwaj, and B. K. Dhaliwal, “Generative artificial intelligence for sustainable development: Predictive trend analysis in key sectors using natural language processing,” Discover Appl. Sci., vol. 6, Art. no. 596 (2025). [Online]. Available: ttps://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-07207-7 [Accessed: Sep. 2, 2025].
