TARU PUBLICATIONS
Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences cover
Hybrid ·Peer-reviewed·ISSN (Online): 2169-0103·ISSN (Print): 0252-2667

WoS  JIF 2026 : 0.4 (Q4)

Powered by:Powered by

Monthly Journal: Publishes theoretical and applied research on topics in information and optimization sciences.

Issues up to 2022 co-published with and available at:Taylor & Francis
submissions@tarupublications.com
Open Access Research Article

A penalty method for linear programming

* , ,

* Corresponding author · click or hover a name for details

pp. 677–685Vol. 45Issue 3April 2024DOI: 10.47974/JIOS-1340XML
Received:
06 Jul 2022
Accepted:
02 Nov 2022
Published Online:
27 Apr 2024
Article type:
Research Article
Language:
EN
Article no.:
JIOS-1340
Pages:
677–685

Abstract

A logarithmic penalty method for linear optimization problem with a new approximate function is analyzed. The function addressed makes it possible to offer a displacement-step without major difficulties.We consider some numerical results which show the superiority of this approach versus line search methods.

Keywords

Subject Classifications

(2010) 90C2290C51

References

[1] A. Asadi, C. Roos, Infeasible Interior point methods for linear optimization based on large neighbourhood. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 170, 562-590 (2016).
[2] L. B. Cherif, B. Merikhi, A penalty method for nonlinear programming, RAIRO-Operations Research, 53, 29-38 (2019).
[3] J.P. Crouzeix, A. Seeger, New bounds for the extreme values of a finite sample of real numbers, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 197, 411-426 (2008).
[4] J.P. Crouzeix, B. Merikhi, A logarithm barrier method for semidefinite programming, RAIRO-Operations Research, 42, 123-139 (2008).
[5] A.V. Fiacco, G.P. McCormick, Nonlinear programming: Sequential unconstrained minimization techniques, Wiley Reprinted as volume 4 of SIAM Classics in Applied Mathematics Series (1990).
[6] R.A.K. Frish, The logarithmic potential method of convex programming, Technical report, University Institute of Economics, Olso, Noway (1955).
[7] N. Karmarkar, A new polynomial-time algorithm in linear programming, Combinatorica 4, 373-395 (1984).
[8] A. Keraghel, Etude adaptative et comparative des principales variantes de l’algorithme de Karmarkar, (Thèse de Doctorat) Universit é Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France, (1989).
[9] A. Keraghel, D. Benterki, Sur les performances de l’algorithme de Karmarkar pour la programmation linéaire, Revue Roumaine des sciences techniques mécaniques appliquées, 46, 87-96 (2001).
[10] M. Kojima, N. Megiddo, S. Mizuno, A primal-dual infeasible interior point method for linear programming, Mathematical Programming 61, 263-280 (1993).
[11] I.J. Lustig, Feasibility issues in a primal-dual interior point method for linear programming. Mathematical Programming 49, 145-162 (1990/1991).
[12] L. Menniche, D. Benterki, A logarithmic barrier approach for linear programming, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 312, 267-275 (2017).
[13] L. Menniche, D. Benterki, I. Benchetta, An efficient logarithmic barrier method for linear programming, Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences 42(8), 1799-1813 (2021).
[14] C. Roos, A ful-Newton step o(n) infeasible interior point algorithm for linear optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization 6, 1110-1136 (2006).
[15] A. Zaarat, S. Radjef, Adaptative method for linear programming problems with hybrid variables, Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences 42(3), 513-531 (2021). 

Views: 190Downloads: 79Citations: 0