TARU PUBLICATIONS
Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics cover
Open Access ·Peer-reviewed·ISSN (Online): 2169-012X·ISSN (Print): 0972-0502

Monthly Journal: Publishes the methodological and theoretical role of mathematics and mathematical applications underpinning scientific research.

Issues up to 2022 co-published with and available at:Taylor & Francis Online
submissions@tarupublications.com
Open Access Research Article

Neuro-quantum iterative algorithms: A hybrid convergence framework for fixed point problems in functional spaces

* ,

* Corresponding author · click or hover a name for details

pp. 2509–2518Vol. 29Issue 8August 2026DOI: 10.47974/JIM-2637XML
Received:
01 Feb 2026
Published Online:
25 Aug 2026
Article type:
Research Article
Language:
EN
Article no.:
JIM-2637
Pages:
2509–2518

Abstract

This paper presents a ground-breaking framework—Neuro-Quantum Iterative Algorithm (NQIA)—that unifies neural meta-learning with quantum-inspired operator dynamics to solve fixed point problems in abstract functional spaces. Unlike conventional schemes limited by strict contractiveness or static update rules, NQIA introduces an adaptive, layered convergence mechanism governed by novel neuro-symbolic residual control and unitary evolution protocols. We establish original theorems that rigorously demonstrate strong convergence in Hilbert spaces, weak convergence in Banach spaces, and residual minimization stability under hybrid topological conditions. Specifically, the Layered Convergence Theorem ensures robust progression of iterates under firmly non-expansive mappings; the Optimal Ω-Selection Theorem derives the spectral-radius minimizing learning rate from eigenvalue analysis; the Residual Stability Theorem introduces a neurosymbolic energy-based correction scheme that guarantees contracting and convergence; and the Topological Residual-Contraction Theorem extends the approach to reflexive Banach spaces equipped with weak topology. This research opens novel directions in the theory and practice of fixed-point algorithms, transcending classical assumptions through hybrid dynamical learning.

Keywords

Subject Classifications

47H1047J2565H1047H09

References

[1] R. P. Agarwal, M. Meehan, and D. O’Regan, Fixed Point Theory and Applications. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press (2001).

[2] É. Picard, “Sur les équations différentielles contenant une fonction non linéaire de l’inconnue,” J. Math. Pures Appl., vol. 6, pp. 217–272 (1890).

[3] W. R. Mann, “Mean value methods in iteration,” Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 506–510 (1953).

[4] V. Berinde, Iterative Approximation of Fixed Points. Berlin, Germany: Springer, (2007).

[5] B. E. Rhoades, “A comparison of various definitions of contractive mappings,” Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., vol. 226, pp. 257–290 (1977).

[6] F. E. Browder, “Nonlinear operators and nonlinear equations of evolution in Banach spaces,” in Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 18. Providence, RI, USA: Amer. Math. Soc., pp. 1–308 (1967).

[7] Y. Bengio, A. Courville, and P. Vincent, “Representation learning: A review and new perspectives,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1798–1828 (Aug. 2013).

[8] M. Schuld, I. Sinayskiy, and F. Petruccione, “An introduction to quantum machine learning,” Contemp. Phys., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 172–185 (2015).

[9] N. Mani, A. Somal, S. Beniwal, and R. Shukla, “Solving systems of linear integral equations via fixed point theory in extended parametric Sb-metric spaces,” Int. J. Differ. Equ., vol. 2025, Art. no. 1226661 (2025).

[10] K. Goebel and W. A. Kirk, Topics in Metric Fixed Point Theory. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, (1990).

[11] C. Finn, P. Abbeel, and S. Levine, “Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep networks,” in Proc. 34th Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., pp. 1126–1135 (2017).

[12] N. Kumar and S. S. Chauhan (Gonder), “A study of convergence behavior of fixed-point iterative processes via computer simulation,” Adv. Appl. Math. Sci., vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 943–953 (2020).

[13] Y. Chen and H. Hassani, “Learning to accelerate fixed point iterations,” in Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 34 (2021).

[14] M. M. Bronstein, J. Bruna, Y. LeCun, A. Szlam, and P. Vandergheynst, “Geometric deep learning: Going beyond Euclidean data,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 18–42 (Jul. 2017).

[15] N. Kumar and S. S. Chauhan (Gonder), “Rapid convergence of new FP iterative algorithm,” Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci., vol. 2081, pp. 89–106 (2024).

[16] Y. Liu, S. Arunachalam, and K. Temme, “A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised learning,” Nat. Phys., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 190–197 (Feb. 2023).

[17] N. Kumar and S. S. Chauhan, “Rapid convergence of new fixed point iterative algorithm,” J. Adv. Res. Dyn. Control Syst., vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 2303–2310 (2018).

[18] P. Patil, S. Kulkarni, R. Deshmukh, and A. Joshi, “Fixed-point theorems in training deep neural networks,” J. Interdiscip. Math., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 701–708 (2026).

[19] S. S. Chauhan, P. Tyagi, and N. Mani, “Rational contraction mapping in F-modular b-metric spaces,” J. Interdiscip. Math., vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1781–1786 (2024).

[20] M. Arjovsky, L. Bottou, I. Gulrajani, and D. Lopez-Paz, “Invariant risk minimization,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–74 (2021).

Views: 21Downloads: 16Citations: 0