TARU PUBLICATIONS
Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics cover
Hybrid ·Peer-reviewed·ISSN (Online): 2169-012X·ISSN (Print): 0972-0502

Monthly Journal: Publishes the methodological and theoretical role of mathematics and mathematical applications underpinning scientific research.

Issues up to 2022 co-published with and available at:Taylor & Francis Online
submissions@tarupublications.com
Open Access Research Article

Integral equation methods in acoustic wave propogation for structural health monitoring

, , * , , ,

* Corresponding author · click or hover a name for details

pp. 2161–2169Vol. 28Issue 6September 2025DOI: 10.47974/JIM-2357XML
Received:
10 Dec 2024
Published Online:
30 Sep 2025
Article type:
Research Article
Language:
EN
Article no.:
JIM-2357
Pages:
2161–2169

Abstract

Integral equation methods are a useful way to look at how sound waves move in structural health monitoring (SHM). These methods naturally work with endless areas, complex borders, and different types of media because they change the form of governing differential equations into integral forms. One important numerical method is the boundary element method (BEM), which lowers the number of dimensions in a problem and speeds up computations. This study looks at different ways to use integral equations, how to use them numerically, and how they can be used to correctly model sound events for finding structure problems in health tracking applications.

Keywords

Subject Classifications

11F1176Q99

References

[1] S. Cantero-Chinchilla, P. D. Wilcox, and A. J. Croxford, “Deep learning in automated ultrasonic NDE–developments, axioms and opportunities,” NDT & E Int., vol. 131, pp. 102703 (2022).
[2] G. Carleo, I. Cirac, K. Cranmer, L. Daudet, M. Schuld, N. Tishby, L. Vogt-Maranto, and L. Zdeborová, “Machine learning and the physical sciences,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 91, pp. 045002 (2019).
[3] H. Humane, S. Hedau, V. Choudhari, M. Hatwar, and V. Kalwala, “Real-Time Sleep Detection and Alert System for Drivers Using Smart Glasses,” ITSI-TEEE, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 33–36 (May 2025).
[4] T. Hey, K. Butler, S. Jackson, and J. Thiyagalingam, “Machine learning and big scientific data,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A, vol. 378, pp. 20190054 (2020).
[5] M. Takamoto, T. Praditia, R. Leiteritz, D. MacKinlay, F. Alesiani, D. Pflüger, and M. Niepert, “Pdebench: An extensive benchmark for scientific machine learning,” Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 35, pp. 1596–1611 (2022).
[6] J. Thiyagalingam, M. Shankar, G. Fox, and T. Hey, “Scientific machine learning benchmarks,” Nat. Rev. Phys., vol. 4, pp. 413–420 (2022).
[7] Y. Li, X. Zhang, L. Cheng, M. Xie, and K. Cao, “3D wave simulation based on a deep learning model for spatiotemporal prediction,” Ocean Eng., vol. 263, pp. 112420 (2022).
[8] B. Moseley, A. Markham, and T. Nissen-Meyer, “Solving the wave equation with physics-informed deep learning,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2006.11894 (2020).
[9] S. H. Haji and A. M. Abdulazeez, “Comparison of optimization techniques based on gradient descent algorithm: A review,” PalArch’s J. Archaeol. Egypt/Egyptol., vol. 18, pp. 2715–2743 (2021).
[10] A. K. Haydar, R. A. Zaboon, and S. S. Alhily, “Solving nth order non-homogenous complex partial differential equation using two dimensional differential transform method,” J. Interdiscip. Math., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1385–1396 (2025), doi: 10.47974/JIM-1879.
[11] Y. Kim and N. Nakata, “Geophysical inversion versus machine learning in inverse problems,” Lead. Edge, vol. 37, pp. 894–901 (2018).
[12] C. Smaragdakis, V. Taroudaki, and M. I. Taroudakis, “Using machine learning techniques in inverse problems of acoustical oceanography,” Stud. Appl. Math., vol. 153, pp. e12704 (2024).
[13] D. Dhabliya, S. Kunche, S. Dingankar, S. S. Dari, R. Dhabliya, and V. Khetani, “Blockchain technology as a paradigm for enhancing cyber security in distributed systems,” J. Discrete Math. Sci. Cryptogr., vol. 27, no. 2-B, pp. 729–740 (2024). 

Views: 217Downloads: 91Citations: 0