TARU PUBLICATIONS
Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography cover
Open Access ·Peer-reviewed·ISSN (Online): 2169-0065·ISSN (Print): 0972-0529

Monthly Journal: Publishes theoretical and applied research in all areas of Discrete Mathematical Sciences, Cryptography, Combinatorics, Elliptic Curves and Information Security.

Issues up to 2022 co-published with and available at:Taylor & Francis Online
submissions@tarupublications.com
Open Access Research Article

Matrix group representations in cryptographic transformations

, * , , , , ,

* Corresponding author · click or hover a name for details

pp. 4273–4288Vol. 29Issue 10-BOctober 2026DOI: 10.47974/JDMSC-3050 Crossmark XML
Received:
01 Apr 2026
Published Online:
31 Oct 2026
Article type:
Research Article
Language:
EN
Article no.:
JDMSC-3050
Pages:
4273–4288

Abstract

The growing need of safe data transmission in the contemporary digital setting, such as cloud-based, Internet of Things (IoT), and distributed systems, has revealed the weaknesses of the traditional cryptography methods, especially in the form of new quantum threats. Traditional approaches founded on number-theoretic conjectures are now facing challenges, and more multifaceted and scalable mathematical theories need to be pursued. This work tackles this problem by suggesting a new cryptographic transformation model that is based on matrix group representations, which are defined on finite fields. The main aim of the work is to construct a mathematically sound and implementation-friendly encryption scheme that increases the security level by high-dimensional, non-commutative transformations. The methodology consists of a representation mapping of plaintext data in the form of vectors and a series of reversible matrix transformations, based on group elements. The system combines the process of key generation, encryption, and decryption in one algebraic framework and is executed in Python (NumPy, SciPy) and MATLAB to perform efficient operations on matrices. The reported experimental results indicate ciphertext entropy of 7.98 bits per byte and an avalanche effect of 52.6%, compared with 7.95 bits and 50.1%, respectively, for the AES baseline. These preliminary findings suggest favorable statistical randomness and diffusion characteristics, although reproducibility requires further documentation of the experimental protocol and independent validation of the reported measurements. Comparative analysis to AES indicates that the proposed scheme has a slightly higher computational overhead, but provides a better key space, structural complexity, and resistance to attacks. Scalability tests ensure that the system works effectively with a moderate size of matrices as well as various data sets, such as text and picture data. Overall, the proposed framework provides safe, scalable and versatile solution to next generation cryptography usage, particularly high security and post-quantum settings.

Keywords

Subject Classifications

68P2514G5094A60

References

[1] M. Harmalkar, K. Jain, and P. Krishnan, “A survey of post quantum key encapsulation mechanism,” in Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Mobile Computing and Sustainable Informatics (ICMCSI), Lalitpur, Nepal, pp. 141–149 (Jan. 2024).

[2] V. V. Williams, Y. Xu, Z. Xu, and R. Zhou, “New bounds for matrix multiplication: From alpha to omega,” in Proc. Annu. ACM-SIAM Symp. Discrete Algorithms (SODA), Alexandria, VA, USA, pp. 3792–3835 (Jan. 2024).

[3] B. Mahaboob, “On mathematical and statistical aspects of linear models,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2375, pp. 020035-1–020035-9 (2021), doi: 10.1063/5.0066924.

[4] K. Bhagyalakshmi, “Ternary T-SO-semmings-4,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol., vol. 28, no. 14, pp. 172–180 (2019), doi: 10.35740/ijitee.L3577.1051219.

[5] S. Dobson, S. Galbraith, and B. Smith, “Trustless unknown-order groups,” Math. Cryptol., vol. 1, pp. 25–39 (2022).

[6] Y. Lindell, “Fast secure two-party ECDSA signing,” J. Cryptol., vol. 34, p. 44 (2021).

[7] S. Korzilius and B. Schoenmakers, “Divisions and square roots with tight error analysis from Newton–Raphson iteration in secure fixed-point arithmetic,” Cryptography, vol. 7, p. 43 (2023).

[8] R. C. Poonia, R. Almakki, A. K. J. Saudagar, A. Altameem, and M. Albathan, “An optimization approach for real-time object detection in IoT devices through edge computing and deep learning,” Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1465–1475 (2024), doi: 10.47974/JIOS-1768.

[9] N. David, T. Espitau, and A. Hosoyamada, “Quantum binary quadratic form reduction,” Cryptology ePrint Archive (2022).

[10] A. F. De Abiega-L’Eglisse, K. A. Delgado-Vargas, H. A. Ortega Alcocer, G. Gallegos-García, and E. Sarmiento Rosales, “A post-quantum end-to-end secure protocol for instant messaging applications,” Cryptography, vol. 10, p. 28 (2026), doi: 10.3390/cryptography10030028.

[11] F. E. Merga, G. F. Duressa, V. N. Mishra, and L. Mishra, “Parameter uniform numerical scheme for singularly perturbed time-fractional delay parabolic reaction-diffusion problems,” Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 825–840 (2026), doi: 10.47974/JIM-2269.

[12] J. Rong, X. Dong, Y. Han, and R. Cheng, “S-box construction algorithm based on neural networks and genetic algorithms,” in Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Electronics, Computers and Communication Technology, Chengdu, China, pp. 113–118 (Oct. 2024).

[13] F. Artuğer and F. Özkaynak, “A new chaotic system and its practical applications in substitution box and random number generator,” Multimedia Tools Appl., vol. 83, pp. 90053–90067 (2024).

[14] D. F. Raj, “Comparative Evaluation of CNN–Autoencoder with existing models for Security Threat Detection in Cloud Environments”, IJACECT, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 71–83 (Dec. 2025).

[15] A. V. Sokolov and V. V. Radush, “A method for synthesis of S-boxes with good avalanche characteristics of component Boolean and quaternary functions,” J. Discrete Math. Sci. Cryptogr., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 561–572 (2023).

Views: 8Downloads: 3Citations: 0