TARU PUBLICATIONS
Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography cover
Open Access ·Peer-reviewed·ISSN (Online): 2169-0065·ISSN (Print): 0972-0529

Monthly Journal: Publishes theoretical and applied research in all areas of Discrete Mathematical Sciences, Cryptography, Combinatorics, Elliptic Curves and Information Security.

Issues up to 2022 co-published with and available at:Taylor & Francis Online
submissions@tarupublications.com
Open Access Research Article

Quantum-resistant cryptographic constructions using discrete structures

, * , , , ,

* Corresponding author · click or hover a name for details

pp. 4583–4594Vol. 29Issue 10-COctober 2026DOI: 10.47974/JDMSC-3075 Crossmark XML
Received:
01 Apr 2026
Published Online:
31 Oct 2026
Article type:
Research Article
Language:
EN
Article no.:
JDMSC-3075
Pages:
4583–4594

Abstract

Conventional cryptographic constructions have to meet the challenge of the quick development of quantum computing, and they require the creation of efficient constructions resistant to quantum attack. In this paper, the authors suggest a hybrid cryptographic model that combines lattice-based hardness assumptions, such as Learning with Errors (LWE) with graph theoretical and combinatorial structures to provide greater security, efficiency and scalability. This framework is a hybrid of lattice trapdoor functions, expander graphs, and discrete optimization methods, aiming to enhance structural robustness against classical and quantum attackers. The performance is compared with the conventional methods of RSA/ECC and lattice and graph-based cryptographic methods. The results reported in this work shows that, the proposed hybrid framework provides the security level of 256 bits and quantum attack resistance as 96.8%, whereas the lattice-based approach provides 82.4%. Moreover, the hybrid construction has the key generation time 21.1ms, encryption time 14.1ms and throughput of 183Mbps. These values represent a decrease of 14.92% for the key generation time, 10.19% for the encryption time and 27.96% for the memory usage when compared to the baseline which is based on lattices. These results indicate that a combination of complementary discrete mathematical models could be a potential way to design efficient, scalable post-quantum cryptographic systems.

Keywords

Subject Classifications

14G5081P94

References

[1] H. Taherdoost, “A comprehensive review of quantum-resistant architectures for blockchain security,” Sci, vol. 8, no. 2, Art. no. 47 (2026), doi: 10.3390/sci8020047.

[2] K. Cherkaoui Dekkaki, I. Tasic, and M.-D. Cano, “Exploring post-quantum cryptography: Review and directions for the transition process,” Technologies, vol. 12, no. 12, Art. no. 241 (2024), doi: 10.3390/technologies12120241.

[3] P. Thanalakshmi, A. Rishikhesh, J. Marion Marceline, G. P. Joshi, and W. Cho, “A quantum-resistant blockchain system: A comparative analysis,” Mathematics, vol. 11, no. 18, Art. no. 3947 (2023), doi: 10.3390/math11183947.

[4] N. F. Mohammed, H. F. Qasim, and Z. H. Maibed, “Outer derivations of low-dimensional diassociative algebras,” J. Discrete Math. Sci. Cryptogr., vol. 28, no. 4-B, pp. 1369–1373 (2025), doi: 10.47974/JDMSC-2276.

[5] M. -J. O. Saarinen, “WiP: Applicability of ISO Standard Side-Channel Leakage Tests to NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography,” 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Hardware Oriented Security and Trust (HOST), McLean, VA, USA, pp. 69-72 (2022), doi: 10.1109/HOST54066.2022.9839849.

[6] G. Iovane, E. Benedetto, and A. Di Lauro, “A quantum-secure cryptographic algorithm integrating fractals and prime numbers,” Appl. Sci., vol. 14, no. 22, Art. no. 10138 (2024), doi: 10.3390/app142210138.

[7] A. A. Moldovyan, D. N. Moldovyan, M. T. Duong, B. T. Do and M. H. Nguyen, “Post-Quantum Signature Scheme on Commutative Algebras,” 2023 15th International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering (KSE), Hanoi, Vietnam, pp. 1-5 (2023), doi: 10.1109/KSE59128.2023.10299530.

[8] O. S. Althobaiti, T. Mahmoodi, and M. Dohler, “Intelligent bio-latticed cryptography: A quantum-proof efficient proposal,” Symmetry, vol. 14, no. 11, Art. no. 2351 (2022), doi: 10.3390/sym14112351.

[9] T. Xia, M. Wang, J. He, G. Yang, L. Fan, and G. Wei, “A quantum-resistant identity authentication and key agreement scheme for UAV networks based on Kyber algorithm,” Drones, vol. 8, no. 8, Art. no. 359 (2024), doi: 10.3390/drones8080359.

[10] M. Richter, M. Bertram, J. Seidensticker, and A. Tschache, “A mathematical perspective on post-quantum cryptography,” Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 15, Art. no. 2579 (2022), doi: 10.3390/math10152579.

[11] P. A. Blanco, L. T. Vidarte, M. Casas, J. R. Martínez Saavedra, F. de la Iglesia, J. Mur-Petit, and V. Pruneri, “Integration of quantum random number generators with post-quantum cryptography algorithms,” 2025 25th Anniversary International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON), Barcelona, Spain, pp. 1-5 (2025), doi: 10.1109/ICTON67126.2025.11125447.

[12] R. K. Salih and A. A. Aubad, “A novel improvement of skew tent map for generating pseudo random numbers,” J. Discrete Math. Sci. Cryptogr., vol. 28, no. 4-B, pp. 1291–1300 (2025), doi: 10.47974/JDMSC-2267.

Views: 17Downloads: 8Citations: 0