Privacy preserving protocols for encrypted data comparison in semi-honest cloud environment
Vijayendra Sanjay Gaikwadvij711@gmail.comP. G. Department of Computer Science & Engineering Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University; SCTR’S Pune Institute of Computer TechnologyP. G. Department of Computer Science & Engineering Sant Gadge Baba Amravati UniversityAmravati, Maharashtra, 444602, IndiaView full profile → , *Kishor H. WalseCorresponding authorwalse.kishor@gmail.comSant Bhagwanbaba Kala Mahavidyalaya Sindkhed RajaBuldana, Maharashtra, 443203, IndiaView full profile → , Mohammad Atiquemohammadatique@sgbau.ac.inP. G. Department of Computer Science & Engineering Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University Amravati, Maharashtra, 444602, IndiaView full profile →
* Corresponding author · click or hover a name for details
- Received:
- 05 Nov 2024
- Published Online:
- 30 Aug 2025
- Article type:
- Research Article
- Language:
- EN
- Article no.:
- JDMSC-2182
- Pages:
- 1825–1834
Abstract
Keywords
Subject Classifications
References
[1] A. C. Yao, “Protocols for secure computations,” 23rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. Chicago, USA, pp. 160-164 (1982). doi: 10.1109/SFCS.1982.38
[2] T. Cover and P. Hart, “Nearest neighbor pattern classification,” in IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 21-27 (1967), doi: 10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964.
[3] P. Paillier. Public-key cryptosystems based on composite degree residuosity classes,” Advances in Cryptography- EUROCRYPT ’99. Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 223-238 (1999). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48910-X_16.
[4] Vishal Kapoor, Pascal Poncelet, François Trousset, Maguelonne Teisseire, et al., “Privacy-preserving sequential pattern mining in distributed databases,” Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. Arlington, Virginia, USA (2006).
[5] Leqi Jiang, Yi Cao, Chengsheng Yuan, Xingming Sun, Xiaoli Zhu, “An effective comparison protocol over encrypted data in cloud computing,” in Journal of Information Security and Applications, vol. 48, (2019).
[6] Yuling Chen, Junhong Tao, Tao Li, Jiangyuan Cai and Xiaojun Ren, “An Effective Security Comparison Protocol in Cloud Computing,” in CMC-Computers, Materials & Continua, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 5897-5914, (2023).
[7] J. Tao, Y. Wu and Y. Chen, “A Secure Comparison Protocol in the Malicious Model,” 2022 IEEE International Conferences on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing & Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical & Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData) and IEEE Congress on Cybermatics (Cybermatics), Espoo, Finland, pp. 332-337 (2022). doi: 10.1109/iThings-GreenCom-CPSCom-SmartData-Cybermatics55523.2022.00079.
[8] T. Veugen, “Improving the DGK comparison protocol,” 2012 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS), Costa Adeje, Spain, pp. 49-54 (2012). doi: 10.1109/WIFS.2012.6412624
[9] C. Gentry, “Fully homomorphic encryption using ideal lattices,” in ACM STOC, pp. 169–178 (2009).
[10] Y. Lindell and B. Pinkas, “Privacy-Preserving Data Mining,” Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Cryptology Conference on Advances in Cryptology. (2000).
[11] Juan A. Garay, Berry Schoenmakers, and José Villegas, “Practical and secure solutions for integer comparison,” Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Practice and Theory in Public-key Cryptography, Beijing, China. (2007).
[12] B. Schoenmakers Tuyls P “Practical two-party computation based on the conditional gate, ” Advances in Cryptology— ASIACRYPT ’04, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin, vol. 3329, pp 119–136 (2004).
