Open Access
Research Article
Think tanks, rankings, the Brookings Institution, and the rise of non-Western think tanks
*Dilruba MahbubaCorresponding authormdilruba@bids.org.bdLibrary and Documentation CenterMinistry of Planning, E-17 AgargaonBangladesh Institute of Development StudiesSher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka, 1207, Bangladesh0000-0003-4909-344XView full profile → , Ronald Rousseauronald.rousseau@kuleuven.beAffiliation 1KU Leuven, Management, Strategy and Innovation (MSI), Facultair Onderzoekscentrum, Expertisecentrum Onderzoek en Ontwikkelingsmonitoring (ECOOM), Naamsestraat 61Leuven, 3000, BelgiumAffiliation 2Faculty of Social SciencesMiddelheimlaan 1University of AntwerpAntwerp, 2020, Belgium0000-0002-3252-2538View full profile →
* Corresponding author · click or hover a name for details
- Published Online:
- 01 Jul 2025
- Article type:
- Research Article
- Language:
- EN
- Article no.:
- CJSIM-2025-03004
- Pages:
- 149–162
Abstract
After outlining the definition and functions of think tanks, we highlight the significant role played by McGann’s Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP). For years, they published rankings of think tanks based on different criteria. Since the United States hosts the most important think tanks globally, we explore several prominent examples, with a particular focus on the Brookings Institution. Additionally, we note a recent and notable rise in the number and influence of think tanks across Asia. Based on McGann’s data, we conducted a bibliometric analysis exploring the relationship between a country’s number of think tanks and its Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The results indicate a positive correlation, suggesting that economic capacity may support or incentivize the development of such organizations. Finally, we focus on think tanks in the Global South, using the Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS) as a case study to explore their growing relevance in shaping policy and research agendas in a developing context.
Keywords
References
[1] T. Medvetz, Think Tanks as an Emergent Field, New York, The Social Science Council (2008).
[2] J. G. McGann, The Global “Go-To Think Tanks” 2010. TTCSP Global Go To Think Tank Index Reports (2011).
[3] J. G. McGann, 2020 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report. TTCSP Global Go To Think Tank Index Reports, 18. (2021). (online) https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/18
[4] H. Özgür, and O. Kulaç, An analysis of the studies on think tanks success and ranking. In: Proceedings 3rd Eurasian Multidisciplinary Forum (2015, Tbilisi). Kocani: European Scientific Institute. (2015). ISBN: 978-608-4642-46-6.
[5] D. Mahbuba, and R. Rousseau, R. Think Tanks and the Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS). Measuring Knowledge in the Digital Age Webometrics, Informetrics, and Scientometrics, Book of Abstracts: 76–79 (2023).
[6] Lewis, D. “Scholars decry funding ban for Indian Research Centre”, Nature, vol. 616, no 7957, pp. 418-419 (2023). Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00995-1
[7] J. Healey, P. Mosser, K. Rosen, and A. Tache, A. The Future of Financial Stability and Cyber Risk. Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution (2018).
[8] Congressional Research Service. Federally funded research and development centers (FFRDCs): Background and issues for congress. R44629 (2021). (online) htttps://crsreports.congress.gov
[9] J. Clark, and D. Roodman, Measuring think tank performance: An index of public profile. Washington DC, US: Center for Global Development. CGD Policy Paper no. 025 (2013).
[10] S.T. Wang, L.J. Tang, and Z.Y. Chen, “The impact of policy adoption of university-affiliated think tanks on economic growth: a fixed effects model test based on China’s provincial panel data”, Higher Education Policy, vol. 37, no 1, pp. 116-137 (2024). Available: https://doi.org/1057/s41307-022-00298-6
[11] J. M. McGann, The Global “Go-To Think Tanks” 2008. TTCSP Global Go To Think Tank Index Reports (2009).
[12] Brookings 2023 Annual Report (and earlier ones), (online)
https://www.brookings.edu/wp-ontent/uploads/2023/11/Brookings_FY23_Annual_Report.pdf
[13] F. Janko, N. Moricz, and J.P. Vancso, “Reviewing the climate change reviewers: Exploring controversy through report references and citations”, Geoforum, vol., 56, pp. 17-34 (2014). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.06.004
[14] O.B. Onyancha, and W.E. Nwagwu, Webometrics of think tanks in Sub-Saharan Africa. In: 16th Proceedings of the International Conference of Scientometrics & Informetrics, pp. 1519-1533 (2017).
[15] C. Cisternas, and B. González-Bustamante, “Social Sciences in Repression Contexts: Bibliometric Analysis of the historical production of the Corporacion de Estudios para Latinoamerica, Chile (1979-1989)”, E-Ciencias de la Informacion, vol. 12, no 2, pp. 82-102 (2022). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/eci.v12i2.50078
[16] D. Kaufmann, A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi, “The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues”, Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, vol. 3, no 2, pp. 220-246 (2011). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404511200046
[17] T. Kealey, The Economic Laws of Scientific Research, New York, St. Martin’s Press (1996).
[18] D.J. de Solla Price, “Toward a model for science indicators”, In: Elkana Y., Lederberg, J., Merton, R.K., Thackray, A. & Zuckerman, H. (Eds), Toward a Metric of Science: The Advent of Science Indicators. New York, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 69–95 (1978).
[19] S. Rousseau and R. Rousseau, “Data envelopment analysis as a tool for constructing scientometric indicators”, Scientometrics, vol. 40, no 1, pp. 45-56 (1997). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459261
[20] E. Albuquerque, “Science and technology systems in less developed countries”, In: Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (Moed, Glänzel & Schmoch, eds.) Dordrecht: Kluwer Academics, pp. 759-778 (2004).
[21] D.A. King, “The scientific impact of nations”. Nature, vol. 430, no 6997, pp. 311-316 (2004); available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/430311a & D.A. King, “Correction”, Nature, vol. 432, no 7013, p. 8, 2004; available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/432008b
[22] P. Vinkler, “Correlation between the structure of scientific research, scientometric indicators and GDP in EU and non-EU countries”, Scientometrics, vol. 74, no 2, pp. 237-254 (2008). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-0215-z
[23] K.A.S. Murshid, M. Mahmud, and K. Iqbal, Readings in Bangladesh Development. Dhaka, BIDS, 2021. http://bids.org.bd/page/publications/?rid=267
[24] P. Dickson, Think Tanks, New York, Ballantine Books (1972).
Views: 413Downloads: 101Citations: 0
