The association between Mendeley early readership and later citations in library and information science journals
*Lambodara ParabhoiCorresponding authorsuresh19871987@gmaill.comStudy, Rashtrapati Nivas, Shimla 171005, Himachal PradeshIndian Institute of AdvancedIndiaView full profile → , Damodar Parabhoidamodarparabhoi@gmail.comStudy, Rashtrapati Nivas, Shimla 171005, Himachal PradeshIndian Institute of AdvancedIndiaView full profile → , Ramani Ranjan Sahusahu.ramaniranjan0@gmail.comSenior Library Information, Assistant (SLIA), Central Library, IIT KharagpurIndiaView full profile → , Manoj Kumar Vermamanojdlis@mzu.edu.inDepartment of Library &Information Science, Aizawl 796004Mizoram UniversityIndiaView full profile → , Rebecca Susan Deweyrebecca.dewey@nottingham.ac.ukNottingham, U. KUniversity of NottinghamNG7 2RDView full profile →
* Corresponding author · click or hover a name for details
- Published Online:
- 01 Jun 2023
- Article type:
- Research Article
- Language:
- EN
- Article no.:
- CJSIM-2022-0074
- Pages:
- 203–215
Abstract
Keywords
References
[1] Aslam, S., & Hameed, S. Correlation of Fnac and Histological Diagnosis in the Evaluation of Breast Lumps. Journal of University Medical & Dental College, 3(2), 1-7 (2012).
[2] Batooli, Z., Ravandi, S. N., & Bidgoli, M. S., Evaluation of Scientific Outputs of Kashan University of Medical Sciences in Scopus Citation Database based on Scopus, Research- Gate, and Mendeley Scientometric Measures. Electronic Physician, 8(2), 2048-2056 (2016). https://doi.org/10.19082/2048.
[3] Brody, T., Harnad, S., & Carr, L., Earlier Web Usage Statistics as Predictors of Later Citation Impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 1060-1072 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi
[4] Byaynko, B., Elsevier Acquires Mendeley. Information Today, May, 11 (2013). [5] Cho, J., A comparative study of the impact of Korean research articles in four academic fields using altmetrics. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 18(1), 38-51 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-02-2016-0005.
[6] D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Russo, S., Testing for universality of Mendeley readership distributions. Journal of Informetrics, 13(2), 726-737 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. joi.2019.03.011.
[7] Dehdarirad, T., Could early tweet counts predict later citation counts? A gender study in Life Sciences and Biomedicine (2014–2016). PLoS ONE, 15(11), 1-16 (2020). https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241723.
[8] Elsevier. Mendeley Manual for librarians. In Elsevier (2017). https://www.elsevier. com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/117992/Mendeley-Manual-for-Librarians_2017.pdf.
[9] Haustein, S., & Larivière, V., Mendeley as a source of global readership by students and postdocs? Evaluating article usage by academic status. In 35th International Association of Technological University Libraries (IATUL), 2-5 June 2014, Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland. Helsinki, 1-10 (2014). http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul/2014/ altmetrics/2%0AThis%0Ahttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lxh& AN=97787053&site=ehost-live.
[10] Jeng, W., He, D., Jiang, J., & Zhang, Y., Groups in Mendeley: Owners’ descriptions and group outcomes. Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, 49(1), 1-4 (2012). https:// doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504901256.
[11] Kudlow, P., Cockerill, M., & Toccalino, D., Online distribution channel increases article usage on Mendeley : a randomized controlled trial. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1537-1556 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2438-3.
[12] Li, X., & Thelwall, M., F1000, Mendeley and Traditional Bibliometric Indicators. Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, 3, 541-551 (2012).
[13] Liu, X., Full-Text Citation Analysis : A New Method to Enhance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(July), 1852-1863 (2013). https:// doi.org/10.1002/asi
[14] Maflahi, N., & Thelwall, M., When Are Readership Counts as Useful as Citation Counts ? Scopus Versus Mendeley for LIS Journals. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(1), 191-199 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.
[15] Maflahi, N., & Thelwall, M., How quickly do publications get read? The evolution of mendeley reader counts for new articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(1), 158-167 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23909.
[16] Mohammadi, E., & Thelwall, M., Mendeley Readership Altmetrics for the Social Sciences and Humanities : Research Evaluation and Knowledge Flows. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(8), 1627-1638 (2014). https://doi. org/10.1002/asi.
[17] Mohammadi, E., Thelwall, M., & Haustein, S., Who Reads Research Articles ? An Altmetrics Analysis of Mendeley User Categories. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(9), 1832-1846 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi
[18] Naudé, F., Comparing downloads, mendeley readership and google scholar citations as indicators of article performance. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 78(1) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2017.tb00572.x
[19] Nuredini, K., & Peters, I., Economic and Business Studies Journals and Readership Information from Mendeley. 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/ Croatia, 19th—21st May 2015, 380–392 (2015).
[20] Ortega, J. L., Altmetrics data providers: A meta-analysis review of the coverage of metrics and publication. Profesional de La Informacion, 29(1), 1-24 (2020). https://doi. org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.07.
[21] Parabhoi, L., How Mendeley Helps to Your Research Work? National Conference of Agricultural Libraries & User Community (NCALUC-2017) on Libriaries Beyond Borders:Navigating Towards Global Dissimination, 64-70 (2017).
[22] Parabhoi, L., Borgohain, T., & Sahu, R. R., Mendeley Readership Count: An Investigation of Sambalpur University Publications from 1971-2018. Library Philosophy & Practice (e-Journal) (2020). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4335/.
