TARU PUBLICATIONS
Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences cover
Open Access ·Peer-reviewed·ISSN (Online): 2169-0103·ISSN (Print): 0252-2667

WoS  JIF 2026 : 0.4 (Q4)

Powered by:Powered by

Monthly Journal: Publishes theoretical and applied research on topics in information and optimization sciences.

Issues up to 2022 co-published with and available at:Taylor & Francis
submissions@tarupublications.com
Open Access Research Article

Neuro shield : Securing neural data with privacy-preserving algorithms for brain computer interface

, * ,

* Corresponding author · click or hover a name for details

pp. 2263–2279Vol. 47Issue 6June 2026DOI: 10.47974/JIOS-2323XML
Received:
01 Aug 2025
Published Online:
29 May 2026
Article type:
Research Article
Language:
EN
Article no.:
JIOS-2323
Pages:
2263–2279

Abstract

Signal classification via electroencephalography (EEG) is essential for smart healthcare systems and human-machine interaction systems. Centralized machine learning approaches are problematic because they require collecting sensitive neural data from multiple participants, which raises seriously privacy concerns. This paper proposes a privacy-preserving federated learning approach for classifying EEG signals in a distributed manner. The framework uses Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and two federated aggregation techniques: Federated Averaging (FedAvg) and Federated Proximal (FedProx) to allow the collaborative training of models without revealing individual raw EEG datasets. The approach is tested on the PhysioNet EEG Motor Imagery dataset with 109 subjects. The performance of the federated framework is comparable to the centralized framework, thus, successfully preserving privacy. More specifically, the model based on FedProx, in a specified Interval of Data (IID), classification achieved 90.36%, exceeding many current federated EEG learning methods. The findings reinforce the value of federated optimization methods for confidential distributed learning over diverse EEG datasets.

Keywords

Subject Classifications

68T0768T05

References

[1] S. Saha, K. A. Mamun, K. Ahmed, R. Mostafa, G. R. Naik, S. Darvishi, and Y. Fukuda, “Intra-and inter-subject variability in EEG-based brain–computer interface: A review,” Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, vol. 13, Art. no. 87 (2019), doi: 10.3389/fncom. 2019.00087.
[2] T. Jia, L. Meng, S. Li, J. Liu, and D. Wu, “Federated Motor Imagery Classification for Privacy-Preserving Brain-Computer Interfaces,” in IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 32, pp. 3442-3451 (2024), doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3457504.
[3] R. Liu, Y. Chen, A. Li, Y. Ding, H. Yu, and C. Guan, “Aggregating intrinsic information to enhance BCI performance through federated learning,” Neural Networks, vol. 172, Art. no. 106100 (2024), doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106100.
[4] J. Wu, Y. Chen, and M. Zhang, “Hierarchical FL for EEG-based BCI: A Personalization Framework,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 31, pp. 450–460 (2023).
[5] Y. Jia, L. Zhou, and F. Lin, “Federated Transformers for EEG Motor Imagery Classification in BCI Applications,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 1234–1238 (2024).
[6] H. Kim, D. Lee, and S. Park, “Differential Privacy-Aware FL for EEG-based Brain–Computer Interfaces,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 155–165 (2023).
[7] X. Lin, Y. Qian, and L. Zhao, “Contrastive FL for EEG Classification with Limited Labels,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), pp. 998–1003 (2024).
[8] R. Zhou, A. Sun, and J. Li, “Subject-Specific FL for BCI with EEG Signals,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 6789–6796 (2023).
[9] A. Rao, V. Srinivasan, and P. Roy, “Graph Neural Network-Based FL for EEG Signal Classification,” IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 215–224 (2024).
[10] M. Hasan, F. Ahmed, and N. Rahman, “Mobile-Friendly FL with Lightweight CNN for Real-Time BCI Applications,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 45678–45688 (2025).
[11] S. Patel, R. Kumar, and A. Sinha, “Hybrid Transfer Learning and FL for EEG Classification,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Computational Intelligence and Virtual Environments for Measurement Systems and Applications (CIVEMSA), pp. 145–150 (2024).
[12] Y. M. Huang, H. N. Hung, and V. S. Tseng, “Privacy-preserving attention-weighted multi-source domain adaptation for EEG motor imagery,” in Proc. 2024 IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, Signal Process. (ICASSP), pp. 7470–7474 (Apr. 2024), doi: 10.1109/ICASSP49456.2024.10098321.
[13] R. Singh, A. Mehta, and P. Verma, “Cluster-Based FL for Heterogeneous EEG Motor Imagery Data,” IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 112–120 (2025).
[14] B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson, and B. A. Arcas, “Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data,” in Proc. 20th Int. Conf. Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), pp. 1273–1282 (Apr. 2017).
[15] G. Schalk, “EEG Motor Movement/Imagery Dataset,” PhysioNet (Sep. 2009). [Online]. Available: https://physionet.org/content/eegmmidb/1.0.0/. [Accessed: Feb. 21, 2025].
[16] V. J. Lawhern, A. J. Solon, N. R. Waytowich, S. M. Gordon, C. P. Hung, and B. J. Lance, “EEGNet: A compact convolutional neural network for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces,” Journal of Neural Engineering, vol. 15, no. 5, p. 056013 (2018), doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aace8c.
[17] T. Li, A. K. Sahu, M. Zaheer, M. Sanjabi, A. Talwalkar, and V. Smith, “Federated optimization in heterogeneous networks,” Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems, vol. 2, pp. 429-450 (2020).
[18] R. T. Schirrmeister, J. T. Springenberg, L. D. J. Fiederer, M. Glasstetter, K. Eggensperger, M. Tangermann, F. Hutter, W. Burgard, and T. Ball, “Deep Learning with Convolutional Neural Networks for EEG Decoding and Visualization,” Hum. Brain Mapp., vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 5391–5420 (2017).
[19] Z. Hu, L. Chen, Y. Luo, and J. Zhou, “EEG-based emotion recognition using a convolutional recurrent neural network with multi-head self-attention,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 21, Art. no. 11255 (2022), doi: 10.3390/app122111255.
[20] M. A. Abdulhussein, X. An, A. A. Alsakaa, and D. Ming, “Lack of ha­bituation in migraine patients and Evoked Potential types: Analysis study from EEG signals,” Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 855–891 (2022).
[21] S. Gautam, A. Khunteta, and D. Ghosh, “Adaptive optimization frame­work for multimodal software defect prediction using reinforcement learning,” Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 2351–2362 (2025).

Views: 336Downloads: 127Citations: 0