TARU PUBLICATIONS
Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences cover
Open Access ·Peer-reviewed·ISSN (Online): 2169-0103·ISSN (Print): 0252-2667

WoS  JIF 2026 : 0.4 (Q4)

Powered by:Powered by

Monthly Journal: Publishes theoretical and applied research on topics in information and optimization sciences.

Issues up to 2022 co-published with and available at:Taylor & Francis
submissions@tarupublications.com
Open Access Research Article

Sustainability transition in SMEs : Stakeholder incentives and business impact

, * ,

* Corresponding author · click or hover a name for details

pp. 2685–2694Vol. 46Issue 8November 2025DOI: 10.47974/JIOS-2090XML
Received:
06 Feb 2025
Published Online:
29 Nov 2025
Article type:
Research Article
Language:
EN
Article no.:
JIOS-2090
Pages:
2685–2694

Abstract

The study examines the theoretical and empirical frameworks of sustainability transition in SMEs, focusing on sustainability strategy, disclosures, and business impact through the lens of stakeholder theory. A systematic literature review methodology was applied using the Scopus database, complemented by keyword and co-occurrence analysis with VOSviewer to explore the theoretical structures of the topic. The analysis identified five theoretical clusters related to strategy and innovation, circular economy and supply chains, competitiveness and resilience, climate change and finance, and sustainability reporting as main drivers of sustainability transition in SMEs.

Keywords

Subject Classifications

91C2062H3005C90

References

[1] M. C. Jensen, “Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function,” Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 235–256 (Apr. 2002), doi: 10.2307/3857812.
[2] R. E. Freeman and D. L. Reed, “Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance,” California Management Review, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 88–106 (Apr. 1983), doi: 10.2307/41165018.
[3] P. Lesnikova and J. Schmidtova, “Development of Corporate Sustainability in Enterprises through the Application of Selected Practices and Tools,” Organizacija, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 112–126 (May 2020), doi: 10.2478/orga-2020-0008.
[4] R. E. Freeman, J. S. Harrison, A. C. Wicks, B. L. Parmar, and S. de Colle, Stakeholder Theory. Cambridge University Press, 2010. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511815768.
[5] Kolk, “Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: exploring multinationals’ reporting practices,” Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–15 (Jan. 2008), doi: 10.1002/bse.511.
[6] Madrid-Guijarro and A. Duréndez, “Sustainable development barriers and pressures in SMEs: The mediating effect of management commitment to environmental practices,” Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 949–967 (Feb. 2024), doi: 10.1002/bse.3537.
[7] Y. Feng, Q. Zhu, and K.-H. Lai, “Corporate social responsibility for supply chain management: A literature review and bibliometric analysis,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 158, pp. 296–307 (Aug. 2017), doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.018.
[8] Paltrinieri, M. K. Hassan, S. Bahoo, and A. Khan, “A bibliometric review of sukuk literature,” International Review of Economics & Finance, vol. 86, pp. 897–918 (Jul. 2023), doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2019.04.004.
[9] Zupic and T. Čater, “Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization,” Organizational Research Methods, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 429–472 (Jul. 2015), doi: 10.1177/1094428114562629.
[10] A. Dhawan, M. Roy, and A. Bhardwaj, “Sustainability and ease of doing business in India : Challenges and influencing factors,” Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1807–1822 (2024), doi: 10.47974/JIOS-1771.
[11] N. Mohanty, J. K. Parida, A. Kumar, S. L. Hota, and D. Debyani, “Sustainable development and zero hunger : A focus on India’s social entrepreneurship initiatives,” Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1717–1725 (2024), doi: 10.47974/JIOS-1707.
[12] S. Mehrabi, M. Mahdad, J. Bijman, C. Cholez, J. C. P. Mesa, and C. Giagnocavo, “Microfoundations of dynamic capabilities enabling scaling pathways of sustainability-oriented innovation business models,” Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 849–871 (Jan. 2025), doi: 10.1002/bse.4004.
[13] R. Gujrati, C. Hatipoglu, N. K. Torun, and S. Kadyan, “Impact of adoption challenges on sustainability outcomes in FMCG green supply chains : The role of smart technologies,” Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1773–1791 (2025), doi: 10.47974/JIOS-2034.
[14] D. D’Amato, S. Veijonaho, and A. Toppinen, “Towards sustainability? Forest-based circular bioeconomy business models in Finnish SMEs,” Forest Policy and Economics, vol. 110, p. 101848 (Jan. 2020), doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.12.004.
[15] S. Cantele and A. Zardini, “Is sustainability a competitive advantage for small businesses? An empirical analysis of possible mediators in the sustainability–financial performance relationship,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 182, pp. 166–176 (May 2018), doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.016.
[16] Ukko, M. Nasiri, M. Saunila, and T. Rantala, “Sustainability strategy as a moderator in the relationship between digital business strategy and financial performance,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 236, p. 117626 (Nov. 2019), doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117626.
[17] Gunasekaran, B. K. Rai, and M. Griffin, “Resilience and competitiveness of small and medium size enterprises: an empirical research,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 49, no. 18, pp. 5489–5509 (Sep. 2011), doi: 10.1080/00207543.2011.563831.
[18] Calabres, R. Costa, N. Levialdi Ghiron, and T. Menichini, “Materiality analysis in sustainability reporting: a tool for directing corporate sustainability towards emerging economic, environmental and social opportunities,” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1016–1038 (Aug. 2019), doi: 10.3846/tede.2019.10550.

Views: 72Downloads: 18Citations: 0