TARU PUBLICATIONS
Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences cover
Open Access ·Peer-reviewed·ISSN (Online): 2169-0103·ISSN (Print): 0252-2667

WoS  JIF 2026 : 0.4 (Q4)

Powered by:Powered by

Monthly Journal: Publishes theoretical and applied research on topics in information and optimization sciences.

Issues up to 2022 co-published with and available at:Taylor & Francis
submissions@tarupublications.com
Open Access Research Article

Examining the effects of leadership orientations on knowledge innovation and teaching efficiency of teachers

, *

* Corresponding author · click or hover a name for details

pp. 2777–2790Vol. 46Issue 8November 2025DOI: 10.47974/JIOS-2167XML
Received:
08 Jul 2025
Published Online:
28 Nov 2025
Article type:
Research Article
Language:
EN
Article no.:
JIOS-2167
Pages:
2777–2790

Abstract

Schools are closed institutions compared to enterprises. Overall, a leader is the key person in command of school operations. A leader must develop an instructional environment with good team interaction and improve team members’ cooperation and communication. A good work environment for teachers relies on mutually supportive teaching and administrative teams to reduce teacher work pressure, increase teacher job satisfaction and job involvement. These, in turn, help the organization achieve the educational objectives. The research results can be summarized as follows. 1. The education administration should strengthen the training courses for school leadership and leaders’ professional leadership skills to keep up with the developing educational environment and promote the effectiveness of school. 2. School leadership should promote teachers’ participation in school leadership strategies as well as encourage their experience sharing and knowledge innovation. 3. A leader should show affinity and keep the communication channels open with flexible and contingent negotiation and adjustment; in this way school leadership effectiveness can be increased and teachers can be motivated to learn to enrich school knowledge resources. According to the results, the present study is expected to propose comprehensive suggestions for relevant units improve and promote school effectiveness in education reform to reach a competitive advantage for the school.

Keywords

Subject Classifications

91B4291B9991E30

References

[1] W. Yang, “Moving from imitation to innovation: Exploring a Chinese model of early childhood curriculum leadership,” Contemp. Issues Early Child., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 35–52 (2019), doi: 10.1177/1463949119825501.
[2] L. H. Jesson, “Exploring the Principal’s Technology Leadership: Its Influence on Teachers’ Technological Proficiency,” Int. J. Acad. Pedagog. Res., vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 4–10 (2020).
[3] J. Poels, M. Verschueren, K. Milisen, and E. Vlaeyen, “Leadership orientations and leadership outcomes in nursing homes: A cross-sectional analysis,” BMC Health Serv. Res., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–10 (2020), doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05854-7.
[4] T. Bush, “Professional learning communities and instructional leadership: A collaborative approach to leading learning?,” Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh., vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 839–842 (2019), doi: 10.1177/1741143219869151.
[5] A. Shoemaker, “Communication and Leadership, Standardization,” J. Res. Innov., vol. 2, no. 1 (2023), doi: 10.58831/2831-7920-2.1.2.
[6] S. Singh, J. Yadav, V. Chaturvedi, and A. K. Pandey, “Understanding the impact and effectiveness of workplace wellbeing programs as a leadership initiative on employee satisfaction,” J. Stat. Manag. Syst., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 921–939 (2025), doi: 10.47974/JSMS-1412.
[7] T. Farchi and D. Tubin, “Middle leaders in successful and less successful schools,” Sch. Leadersh. Manag., vol. 39, no. 3–4, pp. 372–390 (2019), doi: 10.1080/13632434.2018.1550389.
[8] E. Carlström, “Inclusion in innovation leadership,” in Collaborative Leadership and Innovation, pp. 43–52 (2022), doi: 10.4324/9781003211655-5.
[9] R. F. Brueggemann and C. H. Matthews, “Leadership, Innovation and Entrepreneurship,” pp. 376–396 (2024), doi: 10.4324/9781003034308-14.
[10] R. Prenger, C. L. Poortman, and A. Handelzalts, “The effects of networked professional learning communities,” J. Teach. Educ., vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 441–452 (2019), doi: 10.1177/0022487117753574.
[11] O. N. Mafa-Theledi, “Pedagogical Content Knowledge in the Teaching of Consumer Science: Effectiveness in the Classroom,” Int. J. Res. Innov. Soc. Sci., vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 318–323 (2024), doi: 10.47772/IJRISS.2024.807026.
[12] H. Ye, “The Impact of Knowledge Spillovers on Regional Innovation Performance: From the Perspective of Patent Cooperation,” World Sci. Res. J., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 102–115 (2022), doi: 10.6911/WSRJ.202203_8(3).0014.
[13] S. Lee and D. H. Kim, “Knowledge stocks, government R&D, institutional factors and innovation: Evidence from biotechnology patent data,” Innov. Dev., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 459–477 (2022), doi: 10.1080/2157930X.2020.1871462.
[14] M. Akram, “Relationship between students’ perceptions of teacher effectiveness and student achievement at secondary school level,” Bull. Educ. Res., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 93–108 (2019).
[15] J. Waddington and M. Esteban-Guitart, “Funds of knowledge and identity in language learning and teaching,” Innov. Lang. Learn. Teach., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 201–207 (2024), doi: 10.1080/17501229.2024.2328306.
[16] U. Upadhyay, A. Kumar, S. Roy, and U. Rawat, “Balancing innovation and privacy: A machine learning perspective,” J. Discrete Math. Sci. Cryptogr., vol. 27, no. 2-B, pp. 547–557 (2024), doi: 10.47974/JDMSC-1877.
[17] A. Shah, W. Patel, and H. Koyuncu, “Empowering healthcare innovation: IoT-enabled smart systems and deep learning for enhanced diabetic retinopathy in the telehealth landscape,” J. Interdiscip. Math., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 355–367 (2024), doi: 10.47974/JIM-1836.
[18] M. J. Sousa and Á. Rocha, “Leadership orientations and skills developed through game-based learning,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 94, pp. 360–366 (2019), doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.057.
[19] L. Akhtar, “Role of servant leadership orientation on leadership effectiveness: Moderating role of spirituality,” Admin. Manag. Sci. J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25–35 (2022), doi: 10.59365/amsj.1(1).2022.10.
[20] N. L. Cundiff, “Gender and Organizational Culture: Perceptions of Leadership Orientation and Effectiveness,” Adv. Women Leadersh. J., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 50–63 (2022), doi: 10.21423/awlj-v41.a342.
[21] M. F. Jamil and M. I. Mohd-Hamzah, “The effects of distributed leadership on teachers’ collective efficacy and professional learning community,” Int. J. Educ. Best Pract., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 10–27 (2019), doi: 10.31258/ijebp.v3n2.p10-27.
[22] M. M. J. H. Coun, P. C. P. Peters, and R. R. J. Blomme, “’Let’s share!’ The mediating role of employees’ self-determination in the relationship between transformational and shared leadership and perceived knowledge sharing among peers,” Eur. Manag. J., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 481 (2019), doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2018.12.001.
[23] M. C. C. Lee, M. A. Idris, and M. Tuckey, “Supervisory coaching and performance feedback as mediators of the relationships between leadership orientations, work engagement, and turnover intention,” Hum. Resour. Dev. Int., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 257–282 (2019), doi: 10.1080/13678868.2018.1530170.
[24] J. Wen, S. Suang, and P. Hou, “Emotional intelligence, emotional labor, perceived organizational support, and job satisfaction: A moderated mediation model,” Int. J. Hosp. Manag., vol. 81, pp. 120–130 (2019), doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.01.009.
[25] N. Eva, M. Robin, S. Sendjaya, D. van Dierendonck, and R. Liden, “Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research,” Leadersh. Q., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 111–132 (2019).
[26] D. R. S. M. Fuad, K. Musa, and Z. Hashim, “A perspective to innovation leadership in Malaysian education,” J. Educ. Res. Indig. Stud., vol. 1, no. 1 (2020).
[27] M. Lee and K. Louis, “Mapping a strong school culture and linking it to sustainable school improvement,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 81, pp. 84–96 (2019).
[28] H. Tian, S. Iqbal, S. Akhtar, S. Qalati, F. Anwar, and M. Khan, “The impact of transformational leadership on employee retention: Mediation and moderation through organizational citizenship behavior and communication,” Front. Psychol., vol. 11 (2020), doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00314.
[29] M. P. E. Cunha, A. Fortes, E. Gomes, A. Rego, and F. Rodrigues, “Ambidextrous leadership, paradox and contingency: Evidence from Angola,” Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 702–727 (2019).
[30] A. Somsueb, P. Sutheejariyawatana, and P. Suwannoi, “Indicators of innovative leadership for secondary school principals: Developing and testing the structural relationship model,” Int. Educ. Stud., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 11–18 (2019).
[31] A. Genlott, Å. Grönlund, and O. Viberg, “Disseminating digital innovation in school – leading second-order educational change,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 3021–3039 (2019).
[32] L. R. Men, C. A. Yue, and Y. Liu, “Vision, passion, and care: The impact of charismatic executive leadership communication on employee trust and support for organizational change,” Public Relat. Rev., pp. 101927 (2020).
[33] S. D. Mohsen and I. A. Awadh, “An innovation analytical application of the proposed system of equations on Hilbert space,” J. Interdiscip. Math., vol. 28, no. 3-B, pp. 1185–1196 (2025), doi: 10.47974/JIM-2207.
[34] E. Daniëls, A. Hondeghem, and F. Dochy, “A review on leadership and leadership development in education,” Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 27, pp. 110–125 (2019).
[35] K. Erichsen and J. Reynolds, “Public school accountability, workplace culture, and teacher morale,” Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 85, pp. 1–15 (2020).

Views: 82Downloads: 18Citations: 0