TARU PUBLICATIONS
Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences cover
Open Access ·Peer-reviewed·ISSN (Online): 2169-0103·ISSN (Print): 0252-2667

WoS  JIF 2026 : 0.4 (Q4)

Powered by:Powered by

Monthly Journal: Publishes theoretical and applied research on topics in information and optimization sciences.

Issues up to 2022 co-published with and available at:Taylor & Francis
submissions@tarupublications.com
Open Access Research Article

Assessing autopsy in digital forensics : Comprehensive functionality review and comparative study

* , , , , , ,

* Corresponding author · click or hover a name for details

pp. 497–508Vol. 46Issue 2March 2025DOI: 10.47974/JIOS-1930XML
Received:
13 Nov 2024
Published Online:
17 Mar 2025
Article type:
Research Article
Language:
EN
Article no.:
JIOS-1930
Pages:
497–508

Abstract

The role of digital forensics [1] tools such as Autopsy has become increasingly critical in managing and analyzing forensic data. This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of Autopsy, focusing on its functionalities, practical applications, and comparative analysis with other cybersecurity tools. The examination begins with an exploration of Autopsy’s core features, including case management, data recovery capabilities, ingest modules, and its handling of various digital artifacts such as images, videos, and web data. Detailed case studies, including high-profile investigations such as the BTK Killer case and the Boston Marathon bombing, illustrate how Autopsy is applied in real-world scenarios and its effectiveness in uncovering crucial evidence. A comparative analysis with other cyber tools is conducted to evaluate Autopsy’s performance and impact, identify limitations, and propose future enhancements. The objective of this paper is to provide a thorough understanding of Autopsy’s role in digital forensics and its effectiveness in diverse investigative contexts, offering valuable insights for forensic professionals and researchers.

Keywords

Subject Classifications

Primary 93A00Secondary 94A00

References

[1] D. E. T. C. Roberts, Casebook of Digital Forensics, Wiley (2020). ISBN: 978-1119601674.
[2] R. L. L. Kuhl and J. R. W. Black, “The evolution of digital forensics tools and techniques,” Int. J. Digit. Forensics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 45–67 (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.ijdfo.2021.04.002.
[3] L. E. Williams and T. M. Anderson, “Effective case management in digital forensics,” Digit. Forensics Rev., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 34–50 (2018). doi: 10.1007/s11195-018-0481-2.
[4] National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), “Digital forensics,” Accessed Sep. 5 (2024). [Online]. Available: https://www.nist.gov/forensics.
[5] SANS Institute, “Digital forensics and incident response,” Accessed Sep. 5 (2024). [Online]. Available: https://www.sans.org/forensics.
[6] CISO Magazine, “Cybersecurity tools and techniques,” Accessed Sep. 5 (2024). [Online]. Available: https://cisomag.eccouncil.org/.
[7] European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), “Cybersecurity,” Accessed Sep. 5 (2024). [Online]. Available: https://www.enisa.europa.eu/.
[8] K. Sullivan and M. Scanlon, “Autopsy: A comprehensive guide to digital forensics,” J. Digit. Forensics, Security and Law, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 55–74 (2021). doi: 10.15394/jdfsl.2021.1816.
[9] L. Hernandez and B. Corbin, “Leveraging Autopsy for enhanced data recovery in digital forensics,” Digit. Investig., vol. 35, pp. 301–314 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.diin.2020.301314.
[10] R. J. Williams and J. A. Smith, “The role of Autopsy in modern digital forensics: Techniques and best practices,” Forensic Sci. Rev., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 210–225 (2019). doi: 10.1080/08954787.2019.1612334.
[11] J. Harris and D. Lewis, “Autopsy and the integration of open-source tools in digital forensics,” J. Cyber Security Technol., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 145–162 (2022). doi: 10.1080/23742917.2022.2071234.
[12] Martin and S. Bennett, “Using Autopsy for digital evidence analysis: Case studies and application,” Int. J. Digit. Evid., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 89–104 (2021). doi: 10.1007/s12065-021-0924-9.
[13] Basis Technology, “Autopsy digital forensic tool,” [Online]. Available: https://www.autopsy.com/.
[14] OpenText, “EnCase forensic software,” [Online]. Available: https://www.opentext.com/products-and-solutions/products/opentext-encase.
[15] Exterro, “FTK® Imager - Forensic Toolkit,” [Online]. Available: https://www.exterro.com/ftk-imager.
[16] Belkasoft, “Belkasoft Evidence Center X - Digital forensic software,” [Online]. Available: https://belkasoft.com/.
[17] X-Ways Software Technology AG, “X-Ways Forensics - Advanced work environment for computer forensics,” [Online]. Available: https://www.x-ways.net/forensics/.
[18] Magnet Forensics, “Magnet AXIOM - Digital forensics software solutions,” [Online]. Available: https://www.magnetforensics.com/products/magnet-axiom/.
[19] B. Carrier, “The Sleuth Kit - Open source digital forensic tools,” [Online]. Available: https://www.sleuthkit.org/.
[20] G. Grispos and P. A. LePore, “Digital forensic investigation tools: A comprehensive review,” J. Comput. Security, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 195–220 (2019). doi: 10.3233/JCS-191049.
[21] C. Hargreaves, Digital Forensics for Legal Professionals, Routledge (2021). ISBN: 978-0367335559.
[22] R. Miller and E. Johnson, “Comparative analysis of digital forensic tools for incident response,” Forensic Sci. Int., vol. 315, pp. 111–125 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.111314.
[23] NIST Computer Security Resource Center (CSRC), “Computer forensics tools,” Accessed Sep. 5 (2024). [Online]. Available: https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/computer-forensics.
[24] National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), “Digital forensics guidance,” Accessed Sep. 5 (2024). [Online]. Available: https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/digital-forensics-guidance.
[25] K. R. Prasad and B. E. Reddy, “Assessment of clustering tendency through progressive random sampling and graph-based clustering results,” in Proc. 2013 3rd IEEE Int. Adv. Comput. Conf. (IACC), Ghaziabad, India, pp. 726–731 (2013). doi: 10.1109/IAdCC.2013.6514316.
[26] N. Perveen, D. Roy, and C. K. Mohan, “Spontaneous expression recognition using universal attribute model,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 5575–5584 (2018). doi: 10.1109/TIP.2018.2856373.
[27] K. S. R. K. Sarma and M. Ussenaiah, “Texture classification using advanced text on texture matrix,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol., vol. 29, no. 3 (Special Issue), pp. 729–744 (2020).
[28] B. H. Stuart, Forensic Analytical Techniques, John Wiley & Sons (2012).

Views: 895Downloads: 342Citations: 1