TARU PUBLICATIONS
Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences cover

Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences

(Since 1980)
Hybrid ·Peer-reviewed·ISSN (Online): 2169-0103·ISSN (Print): 0252-2667

WoS  JIF 2026 : 0.4 (Q4)

Powered by:Powered by

Monthly Journal: Publishes theoretical and applied research on topics in information and optimization sciences.

Issues up to 2022 co-published with and available at:Taylor & Francis
submissions@tarupublications.com
Taru Online First Current IssueSpecial IssuesBrowse all Issues
Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences
Open Access Research Article

Unveiling insights into stress and anxiety management through the adoption of wearable technologies by Indian youth

* , , , , ,

* Corresponding author · click or hover a name for details

pp. 1977–1992Vol. 45Issue 7October 2024DOI: 10.47974/JIOS-1749XML
Received:
10 Apr 2024
Published Online:
19 Nov 2024
Article type:
Research Article
Language:
EN
Article no.:
JIOS-1749
Pages:
1977–1992

Abstract

Purpose: This study, based on UTAUT2 theory, investigated the adoption and usage of wearable technology for anxiety and stress management among Indian youth. Wearable technology can be effectively used for biometric monitoring, activity tracking, relaxation exercise, facilitating lifestyle adjustments and gamification.  Methodology: Data collected from young Indian consumers of wearable technology (N=288) were analyzed through variance-based partial least square structural equation modelling (SEM) to assess the conceptual model.  Findings: Research findings indicate that Performance expectancy, social influence, and perceived privacy significantly influence behavioural intentions towards wearable technology. However, effort expectancy as well as Facilitating conditions did not significantly impact the behavioural intentions of wearable technology users. The moderation effect of anxiousness with performance expectancy, facilitating conditions, social influence, and perceived privacy on behavioural intentions was significant. The moderation effect of anxiousness with effort expectancy was insignificant on behavioural intentions. The impact of behavioural intentions on the usage of wearable technologies was significant. Implications: The study offered implications for the wearable technology industry and health and wellbeing industry, contemplating the adoption and usage of wearable technologies for consumer wellbeing. At the same time, practical implications help professionals in creating and promoting these technologies, highlighting the importance of balancing innovation with ethical apprehensions like privacy for effective adoption into mainstream healthcare procedures.

Keywords

Wearable technologiesAnxietyStress managementUTAUT2Anxiousness

Subject Classifications

68-11

References

[1] J. Gruber, S. P. Hinshaw, L. A. Clark, and J. Rottenberg, & Prinstein, M. 2 J. Young adult mental health beyond the COVID-19 ERA: Can en- 3 lightened policy promote long-term change? 
[2] K. M. Anderson, K. Y. Morgan, M. L. Mccormick, N. Robbins, S. E. Curry- Johnson, and B. D. Christens, “Participatory Mapping 17 of Holistic Youth Well-Being: A Mixed Methods Study,” Sustainabil, vol. 16 (2024). 
[3] A. A. Koehler and J. Rahman, “Emerging Connection of 20 the Mental Health and Well-Being Axis with Digital Technology: A 21 Quantitative and Qualitative Study,” Journal of Technology in Behavioral 23 Science, pp. 1–12 (2024). 
[4] M. J. Uddin, “Existential Crisis in Modern Man’s Life through the Lens of Franz Kafka’s ‘Metamorphosis,’” Qualitative Research, vol. 24, no. 1 (2024). 
[5] A. O. Adesina, S. A. Ajagbe, A. Nayyar, and J. A. Awokola, “Technology acceptance and users’ satisfactions with telecommunication services,” J. Stat. Manag. Syst., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 35–37 (2024). 
[6] S. Gupta, S. R. Vasa, and P. Sehgal, “Mapping the experiences of work- 17 life balance: implications for the future of work,” Journal of Asia Busi. 
[7] S. M. Kristensen, T. M. B. Larsen, H. B. Urke, and A. G. Danielsen, “33 Academic Stress, Academic Self-efficacy, and Psychological Distress: 34 A Moderated Mediation of Within-person Effects,” Journal of Youth and 35 Adolescence, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1512–1529 (2023). 
[8] L. G. Roos and G. M. Slavich, “Wearable technologies for health research: Opportunities, limitations, and practical and conceptual considerations,” Brain Behav. Immun., vol. 113, pp. 444–452 (2023).
[9] Sara Aristizabal and Anja Jamrozik, “The feasibility of wearable and self-report stress detection measures in a semi-controlled lab environment,” (2024).
[10] S. Sheshadri and K. Hara, “Conversational localization: Indoor human localization through intelligent conversation,” Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, vol. 7, pp. 1–32 (2024).
[11] G. Cosoli, A. Poli, L. Scalise, and S. Spinsante, “Measurement of multimodal physiological signals for stimulation detection by wearable devices,” Measurement (Lond.), vol. 184, no. 109966, p. 109966 (2021).
[12] S. A. Tripathi, M. S. Rohokale, and S. Kumar, “Advances in the treatment of cognitive diseases using IoT-based wearable devices,” in Cognitive Predictive Maintenance Tools for Brain Diseases, pp. 138–157 (2024).
[13] A. Sui, W. Sui, S. Liu, and R. Rhodes, “Ethical considerations for the use of consumer wearables in health research,” Digital Health, vol. 9 (2023).
[14] K. Moulaei, R. Moulaei, and K. Bahaadinbeigy, “The most used questionnaires for evaluating the usability of robots and smart wearables: A scoping review,” Digital Health, vol. 10 (2024).
[15] B. Wies, C. Landers, and M. Ienca, “Digital mental health for young people: A scoping review of ethical promises and challenges,” Frontiers in Digital Health, vol. 3 (2021).
[16] F. Mokhtari, “Highly stretchable self-powered wearable electrical energy generator and sensors,” in Self-Powered Smart Fabrics for Wearable Technologies, vol. 6, Cham: Springer International Publishing,  pp. 125–152 (2022).
[17] Inje Cho, Kyriaki Kaplanidou, and Shintaro Sato, “Gamified wearable fitness tracker for physical activity: A comprehensive literature review,” (2024).
[18] V. Venkatesh, F. D. Thong, and X. Xu, “Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 1, p. 157 (2012).
[19] K. Tamilmani, N. P. Rana, S. F. Wamba, and R. Dwivedi, “The extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2): A systematic literature review and theory evaluation,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 57 (2021).
[20] E. C. X. Aw, T. Zha, and S. H. W. Chuah, “My new financial companion! Non-linear understanding of Robo-advisory service acceptance,” The Service Industries Journal, vol. 43, pp. 185–212 (2023).
[21] J. M. Tsai, S. W. Hung, and G. T. Lin, “Continued usage of smart wearable devices (SWDs): Cross-level analysis of gamification and network externality,” Electronic Markets, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1661–1676 (2022).
[22] O. Ogbanufe and N. Gerhart, “Exploring smart wearables through the lens of reactance theory: Linking values, social influence, and status quo,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 127 (2022).
[23] K. Gopinath, G. Selvam, and G. Narayanamurthy, “Determinants of the adoption of wearable devices for health and fitness: A meta-analytical study,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 50, no. 1 (2022).
[24] A. N. Mehdy, M. D. Ekstrand, B. P. Knijnenburg, and H. Mehrpouyan, “Privacy as a planned behavior: Effects of situational factors on privacy perceptions and plans,” in Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (2021).
[25] J. Henderson and M. Corry, “Teacher anxiety and technology change: A review of the literature,” Technology, Pedagogy and Education, vol. 30, pp. 573–587 (2021).
[26] R. T. Huang, M. K. Jabor, T. W. Tang, and S. C. Chang, “Examine the moderating role of mobile technology anxiety in mobile learning: A modified model of goal-directed behavior,” Asia Pacific Education Review, vol. 23, pp. 101–113 (2022).
[27] W. Kang, B. Shao, S. Du, H. Chen, and Y. Zhang, “How to improve voice assistant evaluations: Understanding the role of attachment with a sociotechnical systems perspective,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change (2024).
[28] J. Oh and H. Kang, “User engagement with smart wearables: Four defining factors and a process model,” Mobile Media & Communication, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 314–335 (2021).
[29] A. A. Alalwan, Y. K. Dwivedi, and N. P. Rana, “Factors influencing adoption of mobile banking by Jordanian bank customers: Extending UTAUT2 with trust,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 99–110 (2017).
[30] M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, and J. F. Hair, “Partial least squares structural equation modeling,” in Handbook of Market Research, vol. 26, Springer International Publishing, pp. 587–632 (2021).
[31] C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 18, pp. 39–50 (1981).
[32] M. Saputra, B. M. Izzati, and J. Rahmadiani, “The acceptance of government resource planning system using UTAUT2,” Jurnal Sistem Informasi, vol. 17 (2021).
[33] I. Bile Hassan, M. A. A. Murad, I. El-Shekeil, and J. Liu, “Extending the UTAUT2 model with a privacy calculus model to enhance the adoption of a health information application in Malaysia,” in Informatics, vol. 9, MDPI (2022).
[34] K. Hamilton-West, A. Milne, and S. Hotham, “New horizons in supporting older people’s health and wellbeing: Is social prescribing a way forward?,” Age and Ageing, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 319–326 (2020).

Views: 169Downloads: 58Citations: 0