TARU PUBLICATIONS
Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences cover
Open Access ·Peer-reviewed·ISSN (Online): 2169-0103·ISSN (Print): 0252-2667

WoS  JIF 2026 : 0.4 (Q4)

Powered by:Powered by

Monthly Journal: Publishes theoretical and applied research on topics in information and optimization sciences.

Issues up to 2022 co-published with and available at:Taylor & Francis
submissions@tarupublications.com
Open Access Research Article

Low rank sparse coefficient based nuchal translucency image de-noising

* , , , , ,

* Corresponding author · click or hover a name for details

pp. 333–341Vol. 45Issue 2March 2024DOI: 10.47974/JIOS-1550XML
Published Online:
17 Mar 2024
Article type:
Research Article
Language:
EN
Article no.:
JIOS-1550
Pages:
333–341

Abstract

The process of eliminating distortion or noise from an image is known as image de-noising. Random noise is introduced to ultrasonic imaging, resulting in reduced contrast in the images. For Nuchal translucency (NT) detection, image de-noising is a crucial stage. Although deep-learning methods have been extensively studied for this problem and have shown compelling results, most networks may result in disappearing or inflating gradients and need more memory and time to attain a spectacular performance. To achieve better overall framework optimization, Novel Methodology of anisotropic filtering followed by a compressed sensing based on Low Rank Sparse Coefficient(LRSC) for ultrasound image de-noising is proposed to achieve better overall framework optimization, this article proposes anisotropic filtering followed by a compressed sensing based on Low Rank Sparse Coefficient(LRSC) for ultrasound image de-noising. This hybrid technique is quite effective at reducing noise while yet retaining fine image details. Real-time hospital images are utilized to assess the efficiency of the proposed model, taking into account clinical accessibility and imaging features.  The peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), mean square error (MSE), and structural similarity index (SSIM) were used to evaluate the proposed method’s performance. Average SSIM, PSNR, MSE values are 0.98, 42.28 and 49 for HCNN[12], GAN[16] and Proposed method respectively. Proposed method have average MSE of 2.6, HCNN have 14 and GAN have 371.

Keywords

Subject Classifications

26-XX30-XX

References

[1] R. Gonzalez et.al., Digital Image processing using MATLAB. Second Edition, Mc Graw hill. 
[2] S. Lal et.al., Deep Gupta. “Removal of Additive Gaussian Noise by Complex Double Density Dual Tree Discrete Wavelet Transform.” MIT International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. (8-16) 8 ISSN 2230-76722011 (Jan. 2011).
[3] H. Guo et.al., “Wavelet based Speckle Reduction with Application to SAR based ATD/R.” First International Conference on Image Processing : 75-79 (1994). 
[4] S. Narayanan et.al., A View on Despeckling in Ultrasound Imaging “International Journal of Signal Processing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition”, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp.  85-98, (September 2009). 
[5] M Goyal, et.al., “Hybrid Threshold Technique for Speckle Noise Reduction using wavelets for Grey scale images.” IJCST Vol. 2, Issue 2, pp. 620-625, (June 2011). 
[6] S.Sudha, et.al., “Speckle Noise Reduction in Ultrasound Images by Wavelet Thresholding based on Weighted Variance”. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp: 7-12, (April 2009). 
[7] T. Jeyalakshmi, et.al., “A Modified Method for Speckle Noise Removal in Ultrasound Medical Images.” International Journal of Computer and Electrical Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 54-58 (February 2010). 
[8] T Koga, et.al., “Speckle Noise Reduction and Edge-Enhancement of Coronary Plaque Tissue in Intravascular Ultrasound Image by Using Anisotropic Diffusion Filter”. International Journal of Circuits, System and Signal processing, pp 239-248. Issue 4, Volume 2 (2008).
[9] Pei-Yin Chen, Chih-Yuan Lien, “An Efficient Edge-Preserving Algorithm for Removal of Salt-and-Pepper Noise”. IEEE Signal processing letter, VOL. 15 (2008).
[10] M.A. Davenport, et.al., “Introduction to compressed sensing”,, in: Compressed Sensing: Theory and Applications, Cambridge University Press (2012).
[11] B. Yagoub, et.al. ,“X-ray image denoising for Cargo Dual Energy Inspection System”, International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication (ICEIC), Jeju, Korea (South), pp. 1-4 (2021), doi: 10.1109/ICEIC51217.2021.9369786.
[12] Prabhishek Singh, et.al., “A novel optical image denoising technique using convolutional neural network and anisotropic diffusion for real-time surveillance applications”. Journal of Real Time Image Processing, volume 18, pages 1711–1728 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11554-020-01060-0.
[13] R. Ma et.al., “PID Controller-Guided Attention Neural Network Learning for Fast and Effective Real Photographs Denoising”, in IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3048031 (Jan 2021).
[14] K Li, et.al., “Task-based performance evaluation of deep neural network-based image denoising”, Proc. SPIE 11599, Medical Imaging 2021: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 115990L (15 February 2021);  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2582324.
[15] M. Wang, et.al., “Tensor Low-Rank Constraint and l0 Total Variation for Hyperspectral Image Mixed Noise Removal”, in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, doi: 10.1109/JSTSP.2021.3058503.
[16] J. Gu et.al., “AdaIN-Based Tunable CycleGAN for Efficient Unsupervised Low-Dose CT Denoising”, in IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, vol. 7, pp. 73-85 (2021), doi: 10.1109/TCI.2021.3050266.
[17] Shashi Gandhar, Jyoti Ohri & Mukhtiar Singh (2022) A mathematical framework of ANFIS tuned UPQC controlled RES based isolated microgrid system, Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 25:5, 1467-1477 (July 2022) DOI: 10.1080/09720502.2022.2046332.
[18] P. Perona et.al., Scale space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 12 : 629–639 (1990). 

Views: 244Downloads: 129Citations: 0