TARU PUBLICATIONS
Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences cover

Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences

(Since 1980)
Hybrid ·Peer-reviewed·ISSN (Online): 2169-0103·ISSN (Print): 0252-2667

WoS  JIF 2026 : 0.4 (Q4)

Powered by:Powered by

Monthly Journal: Publishes theoretical and applied research on topics in information and optimization sciences.

Issues up to 2022 co-published with and available at:Taylor & Francis
submissions@tarupublications.com
Taru Online First Current IssueSpecial IssuesBrowse all Issues
Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences
Open Access Research Article

Co-CEP: A co-designed community engagement protocol as a catalyst for cybersecurity research in Africa: The case of northern Namibia

* ,

* Corresponding author · click or hover a name for details

pp. 475–492Vol. 44Issue 3April 2023DOI: 10.47974/JIOS-1407XML
Published Online:
11 Aug 2023
Article type:
Research Article
Language:
EN
Article no.:
JIOS-1407
Pages:
475–492

Abstract

Through technology, the world has become a global village, connecting geographically distant people into virtual neighbors. This presents many opportunities for individuals, businesses, and remote communities. The advantages of this connectivity have been brought to the fore by COVID-19, as technology and the Internet kept the world connected and functioning. However, in Africa, although much has been done on connecting the unconnected, there remains rural underserved communities. Notwithstanding the benefits of technology and the Internet, the cyber-safety and cybersecurity of those communities living on the fringes of society – rural underserved communities – is unknown. Consequently, many researchers, noting the benefits of technology, have embarked on ICT for Development projects (ICT4D). However, community based ICT4D projects have been failing due to myriad of factors. Some such factors are engagement misalignment, cultural faux pas’, communication, power dynamics and community-buy-in of end-products. With the propensity to circumvent the shortcomings indicated above, Participatory Design (PD) processes may be utilized. Co-design extends PD by allowing researchers and participants to be equals in the creation of solutions to problems contrary to traditional research approaches, that abstract researchers from the community within which they work. As an effort to address these challenges, we present a co-designed community engagement protocol (co-CEP) for rural underserved communities in Northern (Oukwanyama), Namibia. This study was qualitative, guided by Ubuntu and Uushiindaism tenets of trust, neighbourliness, respect, familiarity, hospitality, and collective unity as pillars of fostering communication within 4 villages in Oukwanyama, Namibia. The aim was to understand the concepts of how information flows in order to get engagement from community members for cybersecurity research. We held 4 co-design sessions in 4 villages, with each feeding into the next. The presented co-CEP comprises of 13 elements that are key to successful community engagement within community-based technology projects, especially cybersecurity research. The co-CEP is part of a research study on co-designing cybersecurity practices with rural underserved communities.

Keywords

CybersecurityCo-designCommunity engagementAfricaUbuntuUushiindaism

Subject Classifications

Primary 93A30Secondary 49K15

References

[1] International Telecommunication Union, “2021 Measuring digital development: Facts and figures,” Geneva, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.itu.int/en/mediacentre/Documents/MediaRelations/ITU Facts and Figures 2019 - Embargoed 5 November 1200 CET.pdf%0Ahttps://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/facts/default.aspx
[2] C. Rey-Moreno, R. Blignaut, W. D. Tucker, and J. May, “An in-depth study of the ICT ecosystem in a South African rural community: unveiling expenditure and communication patterns,” Inf Technol Dev, vol. 22, no. sup1, pp. 101–120 (2016), doi: 10.1080/02681102.2016.1155145.
[3] M. Hasbi and A. Dubus, “Determinants of Mobile Broadband Use in Developing Economies: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa,” Telecomm Policy, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1-34 (2020).
[4] C. Stork, E. Calandro, and A. Gillwald, “Internet going mobile : internet access and use in 11 African countries,” Info-The journal of policy, regulation and strategy for telecommunications, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 34-51 (2013), doi: 10.1108/info-05-2013-0026.
[5] Namibia Statistics Agency, “Namibia 2011 Population & Housing Census,” 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.nsa.org.na/files/downloads/Namibia 2011 Population and Housing Census Main Report.pdf
[6] M. M. Ujakpa et al., “Understanding Mobile Phone Use in Electricity Scarce Context: Extended TAM for Sub-Saharan African Countries,” in IST-Africa 2021 Conference Proceedings, pp. 1-8 (2021).
[7] K. Fröhlich, “Evaluating the Effects of e-Government Initiatives on Citizen-centric Goals at Selected Namibian Government Ministry,” in IST-Africa 2017 Conference Proceedings, pp. 1-9 (2017).
[8] P. B. Maoneke, F. B. Shava, A. M. Gamundani, M. Bere-Chitauro, and I. Nhamu, “ICTs use and cyberspace risks faced by adolescents in Namibia,” in Proceedings of the Second African Conference for Human Computer Interaction: Thriving Communities, pp. 109-117 (2018). doi: 10.1145/3283458.3283483.
[9] P. Markert, D. V. Bailey, M. Golla, M. Dürmuth, and A. J. Aviv, “On the Security of Smartphone Unlock PINs,” ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 1–36 (2021), doi: 10.1145/3473040.
[10] G. T. Nhinda and F. Bhunu Shava, “Towards the use of Participatory Methods in Cybersecurity research in rural Africa: A grassroots Approach,” in 2021 3rd International Multidisciplinary Information Technology and Engineering Conference, IMITEC 2021, Windhoek: IEEE, pp. 1-8 (2021). doi: 10.1109/IMITEC52926.2021.9714649.
[11] M. R. Lorini, A. Sabiescu, and N. Memarovic, “Collective Digital Storytelling in Community-based co-design projects. An Emergent Approach,” The Journal of Community Informatics, vol. 13, no. 1 (2017), doi: 10.15353/joci.v13i1.3296.
[12] F. Ssozi-Mugarura, E. Blake, and U. Rivett, “Supporting community needs for rural water management through community-based 
co-design,” in ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 91-100 (2016). doi: 10.1145/2940299.2940311.
[13] G. Kapuire, H. Winschiers-Theophilus, and M. Brereton, “Deriving Engagement Protocols within Community- Based Co-Design Projects in Namibia,” in 14th International Conference on So- cial Implications of Computers in Developing Countries (ICT4D), Yogyakarta, Indonesia, pp. 381-393 (2017).
[14] V. Venkatesh, T. A. Sykes, and X. Zhang, “ICT for development in rural India: A Longitudinal study of women’s health outcomes,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 1-56 (2020).
[15] G. E. Iyawa et al., “Digital Transformation and Global Health in Africa,” in Handbook of Global Health, Springer International Publishing, pp. 1-32 (2021). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-05325-3_6-1.
[16] S. P. Shihomeka, “Engaging citizens: Youth, mobile phones, political leadership and inclusive democracy in the Ohangwena Region, Namibia,” NAWA Journal of Language and Communication (NJLM), vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 4-17 (2017).
[17] F. Huntinghawk, C. Richard, S. Plosker, and G. Srivastava, “Expanding Cybersecurity Knowledge through an Indigenous Lens: A First Look,” in In 2020 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, pp. 1-4 (2020). doi: 10.1109/CCECE47787.2020.9255753.
[18] S. Plosker and G. Srivastava, “Cybersecurity Education in Rural Indigenous Canada,” in In 2021 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, IEEE, pp. 1-6 (2021). doi: 10.1109/CCECE53047.2021.9569147.
[19] G. K. Kapuire et al., “Community-based co-design in Okomakuara: A contribution to ‘Design in the wild,’” ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, vol. 2, pp. 207-208 (2014), doi: 10.1145/2662155.2662204.
[20] A. Singh and K. Chatterjee, “Security and privacy issues of electronic healthcare system: A survey,” Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1709-1729 (Nov. 2019), doi: 10.1080/02522667.2019.1703265.
[21] S. Khandelwal and A. Chaudhary, “COVID-19 pandemic & cyber security issues: Sentiment analysis and topic modeling approach,” Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 987-997 (May 2022), doi: 10.1080/09720529.2022.2072421.
[22] D. Craigen, N. Diakun-Thibault, and R. Purse, “Defining Cybersecurity,” Technology Innovation Management Review, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 13-21 (2014), doi: 10.22215/timreview835.
[23] N. Gcaza and R. von Solms, “Cybersecurity Culture : An Ill-Defined Problem,” in 10th IFIP World Conference on Information Security Education (WISE), pp. 98-109 (2017).
[24] M. Grobler, Z. Dlamini, S. Ngobeni, and A. Labuschagne, “Towards a cyber security aware rural community,” in Proceedings of the 2011 Information Security for South Africa (ISSA) Conference., pp. 1-7 (2011). [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/680YtV
[25] T. Winkler, “At the Coalface: Community-University Engagements and Planning Education,” J Plan Educ Res, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 215-227 (2013), doi: 10.1177/0739456X12474312.
[26] H. Winschiers-Theophilus, T. Zaman, and A. Yeo, “Reducing ‘ white elephant ’ ICT4D projects : A Community- Researcher Engagement,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, pp. 99-107 (2015).
[27] E. Nagyfejeo and B. von Solms, “Why Do National Cybersecurity Awareness Programmes Often Fail?,” International Journal of Information Security and Cybercrime, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 18-27 (2020), doi: 10.19107/ijisc.2020.02.03.
[28] M. Laura Ramírez Galleguillos and A. Cokun, “How do i matter? a review of the participatory design practice with less privileged participants,” ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, vol. 1, pp. 137-147 (2020), doi: 10.1145/3385010.3385018.
[29] R. Smith, “A co-creation design framework to support elderly rural women in refining an ICT platform by,” Philosophiae Doctor: Informatics, University of Pretoria (2019).
[30] H. Winschiers-theophilus, S. Chivuno-kuria, G. K. Kapuire, N. J. Bidwell, and E. Blake, “Being Participated - A Community Approach,” in Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, New York: ACM, pp. 1-10 (2010).
[31] N. J. Bidwell, “Anchoring Design in Rural Customs of Doing and Saying,” in IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 686-699 (2009).
[32] T. Iyamu, “The Role of African Proverbs in Advancing Information Systems Research,” The African Journal of Information Systems, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 476-492 (2021), [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/ajis/vol13/iss4/3/.
[33] Q. Mkabela, “Using the Afrocentric Method in Researching Indigenous African Culture,” The qualitative Report, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 178-189 (2005), [Online]. Available: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol10/iss1/10/.
[34] P. A. Mbenzi and S. N. Ashikuti, “Uushiindaism as a collective poverty alleviation mechanism and social support,” Journal of University of Namibia Language Centre, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 2026-8297 (2018).
[35] P. A. Mbenzi, “The Contribution of Finnish Missionaries Towards the Development of Oshiwambo Language and Culture,” in INTERTWINED HISTORIES, M. Kaartinen, L. Koivunen, and N. Shiweda, Eds., University of Turku, pp. 111-117 (2019).
[36] Namibia Statistics Agency, “2011 Population and Housing Census - Ohangwena Regional Profile,” (2014).

Views: 205Downloads: 43Citations: 1