TARU PUBLICATIONS
Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics cover
Open Access ·Peer-reviewed·ISSN (Online): 2169-012X·ISSN (Print): 0972-0502

Monthly Journal: Publishes the methodological and theoretical role of mathematics and mathematical applications underpinning scientific research.

Issues up to 2022 co-published with and available at:Taylor & Francis Online
submissions@tarupublications.com
Open Access Research Article

Manifold learning and differential geometry for disease detection and risk prediction

, , * , ,

* Corresponding author · click or hover a name for details

pp. 2059–2069Vol. 28Issue 6September 2025DOI: 10.47974/JIM-2347XML
Received:
09 Dec 2024
Published Online:
30 Sep 2025
Article type:
Research Article
Language:
EN
Article no.:
JIM-2347
Pages:
2059–2069

Abstract

Healthcare datasets pose unique challenges: they are large, varied, and often contain hidden structure that standard analysis methods struggle to reveal. In this work, we propose a practical approach that combines tools from manifold learning (for example, Isomap or t-SNE) with ideas borrowed from differential geometry (such as curvature and geodesics). First, we use manifold techniques to reduce the dimensionality of complex, multi-modal inputs—ranging from wearable sensors and imaging scans to electronic health records while still preserving the data’s underlying shape. Next, by examining the resulting low-dimensional “surface” through a geometric lens, we extract features that shed light on subtle relationships among patients’ measurements, relationships that might otherwise go unnoticed. These geometric insights are then woven into a deep neural network, effectively guiding the model toward more reliable predictions of disease presence and future health risks. In our experiments, this hybrid strategy yields noticeably higher accuracy for early detection compared to conventional methods. Importantly, because we can trace predictions back to geometric properties such as how data points “bend” or “connect” on the inferred manifold clinicians gain a clearer picture of why certain patients are flagged as high risk. Beyond the technical gains, this framework is well suited for real-world healthcare settings, including resource-limited environments common in parts of India. By focusing on interpretable, scalable methods, we aim to deliver a solution that can be adopted without extensive computational resources. Looking ahead, we plan to refine the pipeline for near-real-time use enabling, for instance, community health workers to monitor groups of patients at once and to explore applications in population-level screening and preventative healthcare.

Keywords

Subject Classifications

62H25

References

[1] J. Hu, R. Lepore, R. J. B. Dobson, A. M. Al-Chalabi, D. Bean, and A. Iacoangeli, “DGLinker: Flexible knowledge-graph prediction of disease–gene associations,” Nucleic Acids Res., vol. 49, no. W1, pp. W153–W161 (2021).
[2] J. Vilela, M. Asif, A. R. Marques, J. X. Santos, C. Rasga, A. Vicente, H. Martiniano, “Biomedical knowledge graph embeddings for personalized medicine: Predicting disease–gene associations,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 40, e13181 (2023).
[3] P. Cinaglia and M. Cannataro, “Identifying candidate gene–disease associations via graph neural networks,” Entropy, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 909 (2023).
[4] M.-L. Zhang, B.-W. Zhao, P.-W. Hu, L. Wong, X.-R. Su, B.-Q. Wang, W. Liu, X.-Y. Zhang, and Z.-H. Zhang, “RLFDDA: A meta-path-based graph representation learning model for drug–disease association prediction,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 516 (2022). 
[5] K. Syama, J. Arul Jothi, and N. Khanna, “Automatic disease prediction from human gut metagenomic data using boosting GraphSAGE,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 24, pp. 126 (2023).
[6] S. Zheng, Z. Zhu, Z. Liu, Z. Guo, Y. Liu, Y. Yang, and Y. Zhao, “Multi-modal graph learning for disease prediction,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 2207–2216 (2022).
[7] R. Guo, X. Tian, H. Lin, S. McKenna, H.-D. Li, F. Guo, and J. Liu, “Graph-based fusion of imaging, genetic and clinical data for degenerative disease diagnosis,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 57–68 (2024).
[8] Y. Yang, C. Ye, X. Guo, T. Wu, Y. Xiang, and T. Ma, “Mapping multi-modal brain connectome for brain disorder diagnosis via cross-modal mutual learning,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 108–121 (2024).
[9] R. Saha, D. K. Saha, Z. Fu, R. F. Silva, and V. D. Calhoun, “Multimodal fusion of functional and structural data to recognize longitudinal change patterns in the adolescent brain,” in Proc. 2023 IEEE EMBS Int. Conf. Biomed. Health Inform. (BHI), pp. 1–5 (2023).
[10] C. Leelavathi, G. Thahniyath and K. R. Prasad, “Optimizing the deep features using the spectral concept for an efficient video classification,” Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 563-562.
[11] Y. Li, X. Zhang, J. Nie, G. Zhang, R. Fang, X. Xu, Z. Wu, D. Hu, L. Wang, H. Zhang, W. Lin, and G. Li, “Brain connectivity-based graph convolutional networks and its application to infant age prediction,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 2764–2776 (2022).
[12] S. Miri and M. Ilmakchi, “The scalar curvature of CR submanifold of maximal CR dimension with a conformal change,” Journal of Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories, vol. 21, no.2, pp. 201-214.

Views: 283Downloads: 145Citations: 0