TARU PUBLICATIONS
Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography cover
Open Access ·Peer-reviewed·ISSN (Online): 2169-0065·ISSN (Print): 0972-0529

Monthly Journal: Publishes theoretical and applied research in all areas of Discrete Mathematical Sciences, Cryptography, Combinatorics, Elliptic Curves and Information Security.

Issues up to 2022 co-published with and available at:Taylor & Francis Online
submissions@tarupublications.com
Open Access Research Article

Hybrid bioinspired approach for secret sharing algorithm and ownership transfer optimization in cloud based models

* ,

* Corresponding author · click or hover a name for details

pp. 625–637Vol. 27Issue 2-BMarch 2024DOI: 10.47974/JDMSC-1889 Crossmark XML
Published Online:
11 Apr 2024
Article type:
Research Article
Language:
EN
Article no.:
JDMSC-1889
Pages:
625–637

Abstract

It is widely accepted that secret sharing models like Shamir cryptosystem allows cloud designers to deploy highly secure multichannel data transfer mechanisms. But these systems are majorly static, and do not incorporate context-aware share-selection techniques. Moreover, SaaS based cloud deployments require ownership transfers for efficient real-time operations. These ownership transfer mechanisms are backed by selection encryption models assisting in permission-aware data sharing. Scholars have put forward pre-emptive and bioinspired models to accomplish these tasks, but nearly all of them are still sophisticated or demonstrate limited flexibility in real-time scenarios. The proposed structure first gathers cloud logs for various temporal requests and groups them based on IP & resource constraints with the goal of getting around these problems. The modified rules are initially tested on dummy ownership requests, and are later on real-time ownership-transfer scenarios for validation of their efficiency levels based on accuracy of misconfiguration detection, delay needed for processing the requests, consistency of blocking invalid ownership requests, and request throughput levels. Based on this evaluation, The accuracy might be increased by 3.5% using the suggested model, reducing delay by 2.9%, while having 6.4% higher consistency, and 8.3% higher throughput than existing secret sharing & ownership transfer methods under similar deployment scenarios.

Keywords

Subject Classifications

68M25

References

[1] K. Yu et al., “A Blockchain-Based Shamir’s Threshold Cryptography Scheme for Data Protection in Industrial Internet of Things Settings,” in IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 8154-8167, 1 June 1 (2022), doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3125190.
[2] C. Hsu et al., “Non-Interactive Dealer-Free Dynamic Threshold Secret Sharing Based on Standard Shamir’s SS for 5G Networks,” in IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 203965-203971 (2020), doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3035278.
[3] Y. Liu et al., “On the Security of Lattice-Based Fiat-Shamir Signatures in the Presence of Randomness Leakage,” in IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 16, pp. 1868-1879 (2021), doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2020.3045904.
[4] S. Chen et al., “Novel Strong-PUF-Based Authentication Protocols Leveraging Shamir’s Secret Sharing,” in IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 16, pp. 14408-14425, 15 Aug. 15 (2022), doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3065836.
[5] M. Shamir et al., “Charged particles energization during magnetic reconnection in the Earth’s magnetosphere by double layers: an analytical approach,” in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 509, no. 3, pp. 3703-3708, Oct. (2021), doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3236.
[6] H. Zhang et al., “Efficient and Secure Outsourcing Scheme for RSA Decryption in Internet of Things,” in IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 6868-6881, Aug. (2020), doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2020.2970499.
[7] W. Cheng et al., “Information Leakage in Code-Based Masking: A Systematic Evaluation by Higher-Order Attacks,” in IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 17, pp. 1624-1638 (2022), doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2022.3167914.
[8] A. E. -S. Ezugwu et al., “A Comparative Performance Study of Hybrid Firefly Algorithms for Automatic Data Clustering,” in IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 121089-121118 (2020), doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3006173.
[9] J. Gao et al., “Blockchain-Based Digital Rights Management Scheme via Multiauthority Ciphertext-Policy Attribute-Based Encryption and Proxy Re-Encryption,” in IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 5233-5244, Dec. (2021), doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2021.3064356.
[10] S. K. Sharma, A. Chaurasia, V. S. Sharma, C. L. Chowdhary and S. Basheer, “GEMM, a Genetic Engineering-Based Mutual Model for Resource Allocation of Grid Computing,” in IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 128537-128548 (2023), doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3333278.
[11] W. J. Jun and T. S. Fun, “A New Image Encryption Algorithm Based on Single S-Box and Dynamic Encryption Step,” in IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 120596-120612 (2021), doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3108789.
[12] S. Jeon et al., “Cross-Layer Encryption of CFB-AES-TURBO for Advanced Satellite Data Transmission Security,” in IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 2192-2205, June (2022), doi: 10.1109/TAES.2021.3134988.
[13] H. Xiong et al., “A Survey of Public-Key Encryption With Search Functionality for Cloud-Assisted IoT,” in IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 401-418, 1 Jan. 1, (2022), doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3109440.
[14] C. Equihua et al., “A low-cost and highly compact FPGA-based encryption/decryption architecture for AES algorithm,” in IEEE Latin America Transactions, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1443-1450, Sept. (2021), doi: 10.1109/TLA.2021.9468436.
[15] Sharma, Sandeep Kumar, Kumar, Anil, Ashtagi, Rashmi & Jain, Rekha. OCA: An intelligent model for improving security breach of biometric based authentication systems, Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography, 26:5, 1415–1425 (2023), DOI: 10.47974/JDMSC-1765.

Views: 165Downloads: 7Citations: 0