TARU PUBLICATIONS
 Journal of Statistics and Management Systems cover
Open Access ·Peer-reviewed·ISSN (Online): 2169-0014·ISSN (Print): 0972-0510

Monthly Journal: Publishes peer-reviewed aticles on theoretical and applied statistics and management systems, expoloring industrial statistics, actuarial and decision sciences.

Issues up to 2022 co-published with and available at:Taylor & Francis Online
submissions@tarupublications.com
Open Access Research Article

Exploring the determinants of student learning style compatibility with offline/online learning methods for management courses in India

, , * , ,

* Corresponding author · click or hover a name for details

pp. 451–462Vol. 26Issue 3April 2023DOI: 10.47974/JSMS-1039XML
Published Online:
31 Mar 2023
Article type:
Research Article
Language:
EN
Article no.:
JSMS-1039
Pages:
451–462

Abstract

Every student is unique and possesses a different learning style to collect, store and retrieve the information stored in his or her mind. Students usually taking preparing notes, reading different study materials, using different sources to gather information, and sometimes using graphs, diagrams, flow charts, etc. to develop understanding. Over the years, a paradigm shift has taken place from teaching to learning and various researchers have contributed the development of teaching learning processes and methods that not only engage students but also develop better understanding of subject matter. As each subject is different, it requires a different style of teaching method, just as each learner is different; a specific method used for certain subjects may be suitable for one but not for others. With the advancement of technology, online learning provides sophisticated learning environment, refined course content, scientific teaching methodology, and committed participants, well equipped subject experts, virtual course instructors, and so forth. Although researchers have conducted studies in order to understand why no learning style fits all students, the way students learn and store information. Still, the adoption rate of online courses is discouraging, despite the various benefits online students enjoy. The objective of this article is to explore the determining factors responsible for evaluating the individual learning style of student and their compatibility with learning methods, either offline or online. The researcher has used a case study of 852 students studying in Medi-Caps University, Indore. Responses were collected through structured interviews and the performance of students at the end of the exams. This article tries to address the issue of quality education, and provide the self evaluating technique to determine the method of learning, management course with compatibility of individual learning style.

Keywords

Subject Classifications

I2

References

[1] Alka Munjal, Manu Shukla & Purvi Pujari. An exploratory study on digital learning innovations (MOOCS): The future of higher education, Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 43:7, 1665-1678 (2022), DOI: 10.1080/02522667.2022.2128523.
[2] Aruna Dev Rroy, Rajat Bhattacharjee, Papari Nayak, Mohua Deb & Basu Mandal. Stress: A study on students of HEI’s of Guwahati city, Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 43:7, 1849-1857
(2022), DOI: 10.1080/02522667.2022.2128536.
[3] Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. From practice fields to communities of practice, Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments, 1(1), 25-55 (2000).
[4] Bignoux, S., & Sund, K. J. Tutoring executives online: What drives perceived quality? Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(7), 703-713 (2018).
[5] Chizmar, J. F., & Walbert, M. S. Web-based learning environments guided by principles of good teaching practice. The Journal of Economic Education, 30(3), 248-259 (1999).
[6] Christine Greenhow, Charles R. Graham & Matthew J. Koehler. Foundations of online learning: Challenges and opportunities, Educational Psychologist, 57:3, 131-147 (2022), DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2022.2090364.
[7] Dilip Kumar Das, Mohammed Motaher Hossain, Md Shafiqul Islam, M Abdur Rahman & Suman Chowdhury. The impact on education of university students in COVID-19 pandemic period: A factor analysis, Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 25:7, 1951-1959 (2022), DOI: 10.1080/09720502.2022.2133223.
[8] Gupta A, Singh MP, Sisodia SS, A review on learning and memory, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 8(2):153-157 (2018).
[9] Golladay, R., Prybutok, V., & Huff, R. Critical success factors for the online learner. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 40(4), 69-71 (2000).
[10] Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. Educational research in the Internet age: Examining the role of individual characteristics. Educational Researcher, 30(9), 22-26 (2001).
[11] Hay, A., Hodgkinson, M., Peltier, J. W., & Drago, W. A. Interaction and virtual learning. Strategic Change, 13(4), 193 (2004).
[12] Hung, M. L., Chou, C., Chen, C. H., & Own, Z. Y. Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1080-1090 (2010).
[13] Jonassen, D. H. Engaging and supporting problem solving in online learning, Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(1), 1-13 (2002).
[14] Kim, K. J., Liu, S., & Bonk, C. J. Online MBA students’ perceptions of online learning: Benefits, challenges and suggestions. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(4), 335-344 (2005).
[15] Keleş, Esra & Cepni, Salih. Brain and Learning. Journal of Turkish Science Education (2006).
[16] McIsaac, M. S., Blocher, M., Mahesh, V., & Vrasidas, C. Student interactions and perceptions of online courses. Educational Media International, 36(2), 121-131 (1999).
[17] Owston, R. D. The world wide web: A technology to enhance teaching and learning? Educational Researcher, 26(2), 27-33 (1997).
[18] Papadatou-Pastou M, Gritzali M and Barrable A. The Learning Styles Educational Neuromyth: Lack of Agreement Between Teachers’ Judgments, Self-Assessment, and Students’ Intelligence. Front. Educ. 3:105 (2018). DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2018.00105.
[19] Ryan, S. Is online learning right for you? American Agent and Broker, 73(6), 54-58 (2001).
[20] Seel, N.M. Learning and Thinking. In: Seel, N.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Boston, MA (2012). https://DOI.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_584.
[21] Tanya Joosten & Rachel Cusatis. Online Learning Readiness, American Journal of Distance Education, 34:3, 180-193 (2020), DOI: 10.1080/08923647.2020.1726167.
[22] Whitney Alicia Zimmerman & Jonna M. Kulikowich. Online Learning Self-Efficacy in Students With and Without Online Learning Experience, American Journal of Distance Education, 30:3, 180-191 (2016), DOI: 10.1080/08923647.2016.1193801.
[23] Swati Sahasrabudhe, Naim Shaikh & Kishori Kasat. Internationalisation of higher education - Necessity to adapt to new forms of engagement for ensuring sustainability?, Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 23:2, 431-444 (2020), DOI: 10.1080/09720510.2020.1736328.
[24] Yu-Hui Tao & Chian-Hsueng Chao. How online tacit knowledge learning influences traditional classroom learning? A case study, Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 16:4-5, 293-308 (2013), DOI: 10.1080/09720510.2013.777569.

Views: 276Downloads: 109Citations: 1