<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="Research Article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">journal-of-discrete-mathematical-sciences-and-cryptography</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn publication-format="electronic">2169-0065</issn>
      <issn publication-format="print">0972-0529</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Taru Publications</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.47974/JDMSC-2591</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Comparative analysis of Kyber-512, RSA, ECC and AES-128 for secure communication in resource-constrained systems</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name>
            <surname>Somsuk</surname>
            <given-names>Kritsanapong</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>Department of Computer and Communication Engineering, Faculty of Technology and Engineering, Udon Thani Rajabhat University, Udon Thani, 41000, Thailand</aff>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <volume>29</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>1799</fpage>
      <lpage>1821</lpage>
      <pub-date date-type="pub">
        <day>24</day>
        <month>11</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <abstract>
        <p>Kyber is one of post quantum cryptography techniques that has been formally standardized by NIST. In fact, Kyber-512 exhibits the lowest security but achieves the fastest speed relative to other algorithms within the same family. Hence, this algorithm is appropriate to be implemented on resource-constrained devices regularly seen in IoT applications. The design of this research is divided into two main sections. The first part is a comparison about the process to exchange the secret key across Kyber-512, RSA (2048 bits), and ECC over a prime field (224 bits), using a 256-bit secret key as the secret message. Experimental results indicate that although Kyber-512 requires more processing time than RSA and ECC, it achieves average encryption and decryption periods only 8.3 milliseconds and 2.5 milliseconds, respectively, simulated on a general-purpose computer. However, the primary benefit of Kyber-512 is the resilience against quantum computer attacks. The second part evaluates the performance of Kyber-512 and AES-128, both of which provide analogous security levels. This study exploits two forms of data: a structured dataset and grayscale digital images. The results demonstrate that Kyber-512 requires a significantly greater processing time than AES-128 in both contexts. Therefore, the recommendation is that Kyber-512 should only be used for exchanging the secret key, whereas AES-128 should be employed for encryption and decryption processes.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Kyber-512</kwd>
        <kwd>AES-128</kwd>
        <kwd>RSA</kwd>
        <kwd>ECC over prime filed</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <custom-meta-group>
        <custom-meta>
          <meta-name>access</meta-name>
          <meta-value>open</meta-value>
        </custom-meta>
        <custom-meta>
          <meta-name>retracted</meta-name>
          <meta-value>no</meta-value>
        </custom-meta>
      </custom-meta-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
